BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “house property”+ Section 132(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,524Mumbai1,188Bangalore546Karnataka488Jaipur300Hyderabad251Chennai213Chandigarh179Ahmedabad111Kolkata105Cochin89Amritsar85Pune80Indore71Rajkot63Telangana57Calcutta51Raipur50Nagpur49Visakhapatnam42Lucknow41Surat37Agra32Patna27Guwahati25SC18Jodhpur15Kerala7Dehradun7Rajasthan7Varanasi6Allahabad5Cuttack3Orissa3Gauhati1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Jabalpur1Andhra Pradesh1

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. REENA JOSE

ITA/47/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

132 of the Income Tax Act [hereinafter referred to as the “I.T. Act”] was conducted at the residence of the Sri.Jose Thomas, Smt.Gracy Babu and Sri.P.J.Paulose on 04.03.2009 and certain documents were seized. An unsigned draft agreement dated 23.02.2009 was found which indicated that the amount envisaged for settlement of liability was Rs.43.50 crores and that the value

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. JOSE THOMAS

ITA/46/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

132 of the Income Tax Act [hereinafter referred to as the “I.T. Act”] was conducted at the residence of the Sri.Jose Thomas, Smt.Gracy Babu and Sri.P.J.Paulose on 04.03.2009 and certain documents were seized. An unsigned draft agreement dated 23.02.2009 was found which indicated that the amount envisaged for settlement of liability was Rs.43.50 crores and that the value

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. SMT.GRACY BABU,

ITA/54/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

132 of the Income Tax Act [hereinafter referred to as the “I.T. Act”] was conducted at the residence of the Sri.Jose Thomas, Smt.Gracy Babu and Sri.P.J.Paulose on 04.03.2009 and certain documents were seized. An unsigned draft agreement dated 23.02.2009 was found which indicated that the amount envisaged for settlement of liability was Rs.43.50 crores and that the value

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. GRACY BABU,

ITA/48/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

132 of the Income Tax Act [hereinafter referred to as the “I.T. Act”] was conducted at the residence of the Sri.Jose Thomas, Smt.Gracy Babu and Sri.P.J.Paulose on 04.03.2009 and certain documents were seized. An unsigned draft agreement dated 23.02.2009 was found which indicated that the amount envisaged for settlement of liability was Rs.43.50 crores and that the value

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. JOSE THOMAS,

ITA/56/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

132 of the Income Tax Act [hereinafter referred to as the “I.T. Act”] was conducted at the residence of the Sri.Jose Thomas, Smt.Gracy Babu and Sri.P.J.Paulose on 04.03.2009 and certain documents were seized. An unsigned draft agreement dated 23.02.2009 was found which indicated that the amount envisaged for settlement of liability was Rs.43.50 crores and that the value

K.M. FATHIMA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/53/2018HC Kerala11 Mar 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

4 2007-08; 30.12.2011 ITA C-130-135/Cent/CIT(A)/ IV/ 2011-12 dt.31.03.2016 ITA 425/C/2016 dt.23.04.2018 67/2018 5 2008-09; 30.12.2011 ITA C-130-135/Cent/CIT(A)/ IV/ 2011-12 dt.31.03.2016 ITA 426/C/2016 dt.23.04.2018 66/2018 6 2009-10; 30.12.2011 ITA C-130-135/Cent/CIT(A)/ IV/ 2011-12 dt.31.03.2016 ITA 427/C/2016 dt.23.04.2018 53/2018 2.1 The assessee is the wife

K.M. FATHIMA, vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/76/2018HC Kerala11 Mar 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

4 2007-08; 30.12.2011 ITA C-130-135/Cent/CIT(A)/ IV/ 2011-12 dt.31.03.2016 ITA 425/C/2016 dt.23.04.2018 67/2018 5 2008-09; 30.12.2011 ITA C-130-135/Cent/CIT(A)/ IV/ 2011-12 dt.31.03.2016 ITA 426/C/2016 dt.23.04.2018 66/2018 6 2009-10; 30.12.2011 ITA C-130-135/Cent/CIT(A)/ IV/ 2011-12 dt.31.03.2016 ITA 427/C/2016 dt.23.04.2018 53/2018 2.1 The assessee is the wife