BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “house property”+ Section 100clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,387Delhi1,381Karnataka520Bangalore498Chennai244Jaipur222Kolkata199Hyderabad196Ahmedabad179Chandigarh157Telangana109Cochin88Pune70Indore64Calcutta53Raipur52Rajkot41Surat30Lucknow25SC25Nagpur25Guwahati24Cuttack22Visakhapatnam18Amritsar18Patna18Rajasthan12Varanasi7Agra7Panaji5Kerala4Jodhpur4Orissa3Dehradun3Ranchi1ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1Andhra Pradesh1Allahabad1Gauhati1Punjab & Haryana1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1

Key Topics

Section 80P(2)(a)6Deduction4Section 403Section 9(1)(vii)3Section 260A2Section 80P(2)2Section 80P(2)(d)2Section 70(3)2Section 10A2

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. VILAPPIL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,

Appeals are allowed as indicated above

ITA/142/2019HC Kerala01 Nov 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

Section 260ASection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

100% of the gross profits and gains of business of such societies etc., but should be limited to the profits generated from agricultural activities alone performed by such assessees? vi) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the order of the ITAT is correct in not duly considering ITA Nos.142 & 323/2019; 5/2020 -9- that the interest

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PEROORKADA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD

Appeals are allowed as indicated above

Business Income2
ITA/5/2020HC Kerala01 Nov 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

Section 260ASection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

100% of the gross profits and gains of business of such societies etc., but should be limited to the profits generated from agricultural activities alone performed by such assessees? vi) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the order of the ITAT is correct in not duly considering ITA Nos.142 & 323/2019; 5/2020 -9- that the interest

M/S. APPOLO TYRES LTD. vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

ITA/216/2013HC Kerala03 Aug 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

Section 10Section 10(38)Section 70(3)

Section 14 classifies income under five heads, namely (i) salaries, (ii) income from house property, (iii) income from business profession (iv) income from capital gains, and (v) income from other sources. Each one of these heads of income is capable of having more than one source of income. The case on hand deals with income under the head ‘capital gains

M/S. DEVICE DRIVEN (INDIA) PVT. LTD. vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/257/2014HC Kerala13 Oct 2020

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI

Section 10ASection 10BSection 143(1)Section 195Section 40Section 9(1)(vii)

house were assessable under Section 161 of the IT Act. The Hon’ble Supreme Court dealt with the provisions of the IT Act, specifically Sections 5(2), 9(1)(i), 160, 161 and 163. Section 5(2) of the Act deals with the chargeability of the income of a non-resident. The above provisions were dealt with in the following