BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “house property”+ Carry Forward of Lossesclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,953Delhi787Kolkata368Karnataka276Bangalore240Chennai219Ahmedabad194Chandigarh182Jaipur170Pune100Raipur68Hyderabad66Cochin64Rajkot62Amritsar55Indore54Nagpur44Surat37Calcutta36Lucknow35Patna27Guwahati24SC21Telangana21Cuttack18Visakhapatnam16Jodhpur8Varanasi7Dehradun5Rajasthan3Panaji3Agra2Allahabad2Kerala2Andhra Pradesh1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Jabalpur1Himachal Pradesh1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1

Key Topics

Section 70(3)2Deduction2Disallowance2

M/S. APPOLO TYRES LTD. vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

ITA/216/2013HC Kerala03 Aug 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

Section 10Section 10(38)Section 70(3)

carried the matter in appeal before the Tribunal. The Tribunal confirmed the view taken by the Assessing Officer and the CIT (Appeals). Hence the Appeal. 5. Senior Advocate Mr Joseph Markos, while reiterating the arguments put forward by the assessee before the statutory authorities and the Tribunal, expanded the contention by arguing that the view taken by the Tribunal

M/S. APPOLLO TYRES LTD vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/249/2015HC Kerala26 Aug 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM

Section 40

house property? 4. The learned Counsel appearing for the assessee and the Revenue would state that the questions covered by (a) and (b) are similar to the questions raised by the assessee for the Assessment Year 2003-04 in ITA No.26/2013. This Court vide order dated 29.07.2021 has answered the said questions against the assessee and in favour