BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80P(2)(e)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai730Bangalore554Cochin301Chennai266Pune158Ahmedabad113Kolkata102Delhi98Visakhapatnam83Panaji74Nagpur71Surat60Rajkot49Lucknow43Jaipur42Hyderabad36Indore34Raipur26Chandigarh24Jabalpur14Varanasi10Karnataka9Amritsar6Kerala5Jodhpur5Telangana5SC4Ranchi3Allahabad2Cuttack2Dehradun1Agra1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 80P4Section 1482Section 80P(2)2Deduction2

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.SAHYADRI CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.

The appeal is disposed of as indicated above

ITA/196/2019HC Kerala04 Sept 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Appellant: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S. SAHYADRI CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD

E N T [ITA Nos.68/2017, 196/2019, 63/2019, 1/2018, 219/2019] S.V.Bhatti, J. We have heard Mr Navneeth N. Nath holding for Mr Jose Joseph for the appellant and Mr A Kumar for the respondent. 2. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Kottayam/Revenue, is the appellant. M/s. Sahyadri Co-operative Credit Society Ltd, Kottayam/assessee, is the respondent. 3. The details

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTTAYAM vs. M/S.SAHYADRI CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCEITY LIMITED

The appeal is disposed of as indicated above

ITA/1/2018HC Kerala
04 Sept 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Appellant: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S. SAHYADRI CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD

E N T [ITA Nos.68/2017, 196/2019, 63/2019, 1/2018, 219/2019] S.V.Bhatti, J. We have heard Mr Navneeth N. Nath holding for Mr Jose Joseph for the appellant and Mr A Kumar for the respondent. 2. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Kottayam/Revenue, is the appellant. M/s. Sahyadri Co-operative Credit Society Ltd, Kottayam/assessee, is the respondent. 3. The details

M/S. KERALA STATE CO-OP.AGRICULTURAL & RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/2/2017HC Kerala24 Sept 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM

Section 80P(2)(a)

80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act, without considering the Information received under RTI from the Registrar of Co- operative Societies and NABARD stating that the Appellant is not a 'co-operative bank' and instead is a 'State Land Development Bank' in accordance with Section 2(v) of NABARD ITA Nos.2, 6, 30 & 31/2017

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. THE PONKUNNAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD

Appeals are allowed and remanded back

ITA/43/2019HC Kerala16 Mar 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(4)

E N T [ ITA.43/2019, ITA.114/2019 ] Dated this the 16th day of March 2021 S.V. Bhatti, J. Heard learned Senior Advocate P K R Menon for appellant and Dr K P Pradeep for respondent. 2. The Revenue is the appellant. The appeals are filed questioning the order dated 14.08.2018 of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench, Cochin in ITA Nos.118/COCH/2048

M/S. NILESHWAR RANGEKALLU CHETHU VYAVASAYA THOZHILALI SAHAKARANA SANGHAM vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/120/2019HC Kerala14 Mar 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

For Appellant: M/S. NILESHWAR RANGEKALLU CHETHU VYAVASAYA THOZHILALIFor Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 139(4)Section 148Section 80P

E N T A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J. As both these appeals arise out of a common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench, in relation to the appellant/assessee and involve a common issue relating to the entitlement of the appellant to deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act [hereinafter referred to as the 'IT Act'], they