BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80Pclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai896Bangalore662Pune420Cochin342Chennai280Delhi171Kolkata153Ahmedabad140Panaji131Visakhapatnam90Nagpur85Raipur80Surat79Rajkot65Jaipur63Hyderabad55Chandigarh55Lucknow45Indore43Karnataka23Amritsar18Jodhpur16Jabalpur10Varanasi10Kerala7Telangana7SC4Ranchi4Calcutta3Agra3Patna2Dehradun2Cuttack2Orissa1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 80P7Section 80P(2)(a)7Section 36(1)(viia)5Section 36(1)4Deduction4Section 80P(2)2Section 1482

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.SAHYADRI CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.

The appeal is disposed of as indicated above

ITA/196/2019HC Kerala04 Sept 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Appellant: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S. SAHYADRI CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD

Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, ‘the Act’) of Rs. 1,42,23,305/- and ITA Nos.68/2017, 196/2019, 63/2019, 1/2018, 219/2019 -8- return of income at Rs.1,62,080/-. 5. The Assessing Officer first disallowed

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTTAYAM vs. M/S.SAHYADRI CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCEITY LIMITED

The appeal is disposed of as indicated above

ITA/1/2018HC Kerala04 Sept 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Appellant: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S. SAHYADRI CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD

Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, ‘the Act’) of Rs. 1,42,23,305/- and ITA Nos.68/2017, 196/2019, 63/2019, 1/2018, 219/2019 -8- return of income at Rs.1,62,080/-. 5. The Assessing Officer first disallowed

M/S. KERALA STATE CO-OP.AGRICULTURAL & RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/2/2017HC Kerala24 Sept 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM

Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowance under Section 40A(9) of the Act, leading to additions in the "profits of business" is susceptible to taxation independently, if the Appellant would be entitled to a complete deduction of income from "Profit of business" available to a cooperative society under Section 80P

M/S. NILESHWAR RANGEKALLU CHETHU VYAVASAYA THOZHILALI SAHAKARANA SANGHAM vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/120/2019HC Kerala14 Mar 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

For Appellant: M/S. NILESHWAR RANGEKALLU CHETHU VYAVASAYA THOZHILALIFor Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 139(4)Section 148Section 80P

Section 80P was disallowed on the ground that the claim for deduction had not been made in a valid return

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. THE PONKUNNAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD

Appeals are allowed and remanded back

ITA/43/2019HC Kerala16 Mar 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(4)

Section 80P(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'), and the deduction claimed by the assessee was disallowed

M/S.INDIA COFFEE BOARD WORKERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/86/2015HC Kerala10 Aug 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: M/S.INDIA COFFEE BOARD WORKERS CO-OPERATIVEFor Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 260ASection 40Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

disallowed and assessed under Section 40(a)(ia) r.w.s.194J; (b) Interest incomes received from the assessee's members totalling Rs.16,93,3334/- was omitted to be taxed”. 2. Appellant had filed a return of income for the year in question declaring a loss of Rs.2,97,446/-. The assessment was completed by the assessing officer demanding a total income

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOCHI 2 vs. ERNAKULAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD

ITA/63/2017HC Kerala31 Aug 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM

For Appellant: ERNAKULAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTDFor Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOCHI 2
Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 80P

80P. During the assessment year in question they claimed deductions under section 36(1)(viia)(a) of the Act. Only with reference to the assessment year in question the appellants-assessees have created provision for bad and doubtful debts in the books of account. So far as this issue is concerned, the opinion of the Assessing Officer