BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “disallowance”+ Section 69clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,310Delhi3,722Bangalore1,192Chennai1,152Kolkata1,063Ahmedabad582Jaipur484Hyderabad478Indore354Pune279Chandigarh219Surat201Raipur172Amritsar140Nagpur136Rajkot130Cochin115Visakhapatnam108Lucknow77Cuttack66Ranchi65Karnataka63Allahabad46Guwahati45Calcutta42Jodhpur36Patna25Agra23Telangana23Dehradun22SC21Varanasi14Panaji11Jabalpur8Kerala6Punjab & Haryana4Rajasthan2MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1Himachal Pradesh1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 2634Section 115B3Section 36(1)(vii)3Set Off of Losses3Section 682Section 362Section 32(2)2Deduction2Depreciation2Carry Forward of Losses

BHIMA JEWELLERS vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/15/2021HC Kerala25 Aug 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: M/S BHIMA JEWELLERSFor Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 115Section 115BSection 263Section 68Section 69Section 69ASection 69BSection 69CSection 69D

disallowance is contrary to law in-so far as assessment year 2013-14 is concerned? ITA No.15 of 2021 -4- 4. The circumstances relevant for disposing of the appeal are in a limited sphere and are stated thus: On 30th of September 2013, the assessee filed the returns of the assessment year 2013-2014 declaring Rs.14,12,120/- as taxable

2

M/S. KUNNEL ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS (P) LTD vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Appeals are allowed and remanded with the observations as

ITA/66/2020HC Kerala14 Dec 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: M/S.KUNNEL ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS (P) LTDFor Respondent: THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 143(2)Section 36Section 43B

disallowance of Service Tax payable amounting to Rs.3,52,69,463/- is hereby deleted and this ground of appeal of the appellant is allowed.” The Revenue filed a second appeal before the Tribunal. Through the order in Annexure-C dated 19.05.2020, the ground raised by ITA Nos.62/2020, 66/2020 -8- the Revenue on the application and entitlement of Section

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. DHANALAXMI BANK LTD

ITA/59/2020HC Kerala04 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

For Appellant: M/S.DHANALAXMI BANK LTDFor Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36Section 36(1)(vii)

disallowing an amount of Rs.1,80,04,849/- under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, the said order was set aside by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Thrissur, by an order dated 18.12.2018 finding the assessment order as erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue. In the order of the Principal Commissioner, it was noticed that

M/S. KINFRA EXPORT PROMOTION INDUSTRIAL PARKS LTD., vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (OSD)

ITA/65/2018HC Kerala07 Apr 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

Section 260A

Section 43 of the Act, in the respective assessment years detailing that the grant is a capital reserve and proportionately reduced the grant received from the written down value of fixed assets. The effect thereof, in computation, is that the depreciation claimed by the assessee has been found to be incorrect and the depreciation claimed has been disallowed

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,COCHIN. vs. M/S.PREMIER TYRES LTD., KALAMASSERRY

ITA/1358/2009HC Kerala23 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,COCHINFor Respondent: M/S.PREMIER TYRES LTD., KALAMASSERRY
Section 32(2)

disallowed the claim of assessee for set off of unabsorbed depreciation for the assessment years 1998-1999 and 2001-02. The assessee filed appeals against the order in Annexure A dated 31.1.2005 before the CIT (Appeals) and CIT (Appeals) through order in Annexure-B dated 16.8.2005 allowed the appeal of assessee and directed AO to allow carry forward

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PREMIER TYRES LTD.

ITA/1359/2009HC Kerala23 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,COCHINFor Respondent: M/S.PREMIER TYRES LTD., KALAMASSERRY
Section 32(2)

disallowed the claim of assessee for set off of unabsorbed depreciation for the assessment years 1998-1999 and 2001-02. The assessee filed appeals against the order in Annexure A dated 31.1.2005 before the CIT (Appeals) and CIT (Appeals) through order in Annexure-B dated 16.8.2005 allowed the appeal of assessee and directed AO to allow carry forward