THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD.

The appeal is allowed in part, answering question no

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

67,52,748/-. 3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is correct in law in allowing assessee bank's claim ofRs. 50,17,000/ as expenditure on account of payment of pension? 4. Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in following the decision

M/S.APOLLO TYRES LTD. vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

1 (2019) 419 ITR 100 I.T.A. No.26/2013 -14- findings of fact recorded, the question is answered in favour of the Revenue, against the assessee. 9. Substantial question no.3 relates to disallowance of part depreciation claimed by the assessee of Gurgaon building aggregating to Rs.25,27,505/- in relation to the let out portion to Appolo International Ltd. The assessee challenges

K.M. FATHIMA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

67 OF 2018 AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 425/2016 OF I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH APPELLANT/S: K.M.FATHIMA 05_04_2022 at 8.30 p mAGED 54 YEARS SHELTER, JAYANTHI NAGAR, P.T. USHA ROAD, CALICUT. BY ADVS. HARISANKAR V. MENON; MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENT/S: COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOCHI-682 013 OTHER PRESENT: SC JOSE JOSEPH THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME

K.M. FATHIMA, vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

67 OF 2018 AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 425/2016 OF I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH APPELLANT/S: K.M.FATHIMA 05_04_2022 at 8.30 p mAGED 54 YEARS SHELTER, JAYANTHI NAGAR, P.T. USHA ROAD, CALICUT. BY ADVS. HARISANKAR V. MENON; MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENT/S: COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOCHI-682 013 OTHER PRESENT: SC JOSE JOSEPH THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME