BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

13 results for “disallowance”+ Section 56clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,858Delhi4,058Bangalore1,566Chennai1,432Kolkata1,061Ahmedabad738Hyderabad566Jaipur444Pune352Chandigarh306Indore305Surat243Raipur188Cochin173Nagpur160Rajkot146Lucknow123Amritsar120Visakhapatnam105Cuttack95Agra92Karnataka84Panaji65Jodhpur56Calcutta55Guwahati54Allahabad47SC36Patna35Varanasi31Ranchi30Telangana29Dehradun26Jabalpur18Kerala13Orissa6Punjab & Haryana4Himachal Pradesh4Rajasthan2

Key Topics

Section 26310Section 115B3Section 682Section 112

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. REENA JOSE

ITA/47/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

56 & 68/20 & 6/21 :: 21 :: 11.7 In the case of Cadell Weaving Mill Co. (P.) Ltd. (273 ITR 1), the argument before the Supreme Court was arising out of the return of income of the assessee. The amount received by the asessee on surrender of tenancy right, whether liable to capital gains under section 45 of the Income

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. JOSE THOMAS,

ITA/56/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

56 & 68/20 & 6/21 :: 21 :: 11.7 In the case of Cadell Weaving Mill Co. (P.) Ltd. (273 ITR 1), the argument before the Supreme Court was arising out of the return of income of the assessee. The amount received by the asessee on surrender of tenancy right, whether liable to capital gains under section 45 of the Income

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. GRACY BABU,

ITA/48/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

56 & 68/20 & 6/21 :: 21 :: 11.7 In the case of Cadell Weaving Mill Co. (P.) Ltd. (273 ITR 1), the argument before the Supreme Court was arising out of the return of income of the assessee. The amount received by the asessee on surrender of tenancy right, whether liable to capital gains under section 45 of the Income

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. JOSE THOMAS

ITA/46/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

56 & 68/20 & 6/21 :: 21 :: 11.7 In the case of Cadell Weaving Mill Co. (P.) Ltd. (273 ITR 1), the argument before the Supreme Court was arising out of the return of income of the assessee. The amount received by the asessee on surrender of tenancy right, whether liable to capital gains under section 45 of the Income

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. SMT.GRACY BABU,

ITA/54/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

56 & 68/20 & 6/21 :: 21 :: 11.7 In the case of Cadell Weaving Mill Co. (P.) Ltd. (273 ITR 1), the argument before the Supreme Court was arising out of the return of income of the assessee. The amount received by the asessee on surrender of tenancy right, whether liable to capital gains under section 45 of the Income

M/S. KERALA STATE CO-OP.AGRICULTURAL & RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/2/2017HC Kerala24 Sept 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM

Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowed both by the Tribunal and the authorities as well in the orders referred to in the tabular statement. Hence, the appeals at the instance of the assessee. 3.2 The Tribunal while rejecting the deduction under Section 80P(2) remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for consideration of assessee's entitlement for deduction as a rural land development bank

BHIMA JEWELLERS vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/15/2021HC Kerala25 Aug 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: M/S BHIMA JEWELLERSFor Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 115Section 115BSection 263Section 68Section 69Section 69ASection 69BSection 69CSection 69D

disallowance is contrary to law in-so far as assessment year 2013-14 is concerned? ITA No.15 of 2021 -4- 4. The circumstances relevant for disposing of the appeal are in a limited sphere and are stated thus: On 30th of September 2013, the assessee filed the returns of the assessment year 2013-2014 declaring Rs.14,12,120/- as taxable

K.A.RAUF vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/56/2018HC Kerala10 Mar 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

56 OF 2018 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 493/2015 OF I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH APPELLANT/S: K.A.RAUF AGED 62 YEARS SHELTHER, JAYANTHI NAGAR, P.T. USHA ROAD, CALICUT BY ADVS. HARISANKAR V. MENON MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENT/S: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOCHI - 682013 BY ADVS. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SENIOR COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME

K.A.RAUF vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/60/2018HC Kerala10 Mar 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

56 OF 2018 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 493/2015 OF I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH APPELLANT/S: K.A.RAUF AGED 62 YEARS SHELTHER, JAYANTHI NAGAR, P.T. USHA ROAD, CALICUT BY ADVS. HARISANKAR V. MENON MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENT/S: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOCHI - 682013 BY ADVS. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SENIOR COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME

K.A.RAUF vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX

ITA/54/2018HC Kerala10 Mar 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

56 OF 2018 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 493/2015 OF I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH APPELLANT/S: K.A.RAUF AGED 62 YEARS SHELTHER, JAYANTHI NAGAR, P.T. USHA ROAD, CALICUT BY ADVS. HARISANKAR V. MENON MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENT/S: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOCHI - 682013 BY ADVS. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SENIOR COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME

K.A.RAUF, vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX,

ITA/58/2018HC Kerala10 Mar 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

56 OF 2018 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 493/2015 OF I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH APPELLANT/S: K.A.RAUF AGED 62 YEARS SHELTHER, JAYANTHI NAGAR, P.T. USHA ROAD, CALICUT BY ADVS. HARISANKAR V. MENON MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENT/S: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOCHI - 682013 BY ADVS. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SENIOR COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME

K.A.RAUG vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/63/2018HC Kerala10 Mar 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

56 OF 2018 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 493/2015 OF I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH APPELLANT/S: K.A.RAUF AGED 62 YEARS SHELTHER, JAYANTHI NAGAR, P.T. USHA ROAD, CALICUT BY ADVS. HARISANKAR V. MENON MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENT/S: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOCHI - 682013 BY ADVS. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SENIOR COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX(EXEMPTIONS) vs. M/S CHOICE FOUNDATION

ITA/180/2019HC Kerala11 Nov 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12Section 13(8)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 154Section 2(24)(iia)Section 260ASection 263

56,579/-. The Commissioner of the Income Tax (Exemptions) had taken up proceedings under Sec.263 of the Act. In the proceedings initiated under Sec.263, the Commissioner noted the details concerning Rs.2,08,91,000/- which was reduced from the total income of the assessee vide order dated 06.08.2015 and which constituted building fund stated to have been collected