BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “disallowance”+ Section 270clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai879Delhi637Chennai248Bangalore216Kolkata196Jaipur104Pune101Ahmedabad89Hyderabad76Chandigarh68Surat48Cuttack40Calcutta35Indore34Rajkot29Allahabad23Cochin23Amritsar23Karnataka20Panaji18Guwahati16Visakhapatnam12Nagpur11Kerala7Lucknow5Jodhpur5Raipur5Dehradun5Telangana5Agra5Varanasi4SC3Patna2Jabalpur2Punjab & Haryana2Ranchi2Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 36(1)(viia)20Section 36(1)11Section 36(1)(vii)7Section 36(2)5Deduction5Limitation/Time-bar5Depreciation4Section 260A3Section 32(2)2

THECOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,TRICHUR vs. CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LTD.,TRICHUR

Appeal stands dismissed

ITA/1439/2009HC Kerala13 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

Section 260ASection 36(1)Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(2)

disallowed? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the claim of bad debts and bad and doubtful debts is an allowable deduction? 3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the claim of depreciation on government securities is an allowable deduction?” I.T.A. No.1439/2009 -4- 3. The first and the second questions

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TRICHUR vs. M/S.DHANALAKSHMI BANK LTD.,TRICHUR

Appeal stands dismissed accordingly

Section 2602
Set Off of Losses2
Carry Forward of Losses2
ITA/304/2009HC Kerala13 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: M/S.DHANALAKSHMI BANK LTD.,TRICHURFor Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TRICHUR
Section 260Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(2)

disallowance of bad debts written off under section 36(1) (vii) amounting to Rs.22,78,703/-? ii) in allowing the bad written off under Section 36(1) (vii) amounting to Rs.22,78,703/- 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and also in the light of the decision of the Supreme Court in United Commercial

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,TRICHUR vs. THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD.,TRICHUR.

Appeal stands dismissed

ITA/178/2009HC Kerala13 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

Section 260ASection 36(1)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(2)

disallowance of depreciation made by the Assessing Officer? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in holding that the investments made by the assessee in approved government securities form part of its stock in trade and therefore, the claim of depreciation on the revaluation of the securities was rightly claimed

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. THE DHANALAKSHMI BANK LTD.

Appeal stands dismissed accordingly

ITA/1065/2009HC Kerala13 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S.THE DHANALAKSHMI BANK LTD
Section 260Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(2)

disallowed” 3.Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the claim of bad debts and bad and doubtful debts is an allowable deduction? ITA NO. 1065 OF 2009 - 4 - 3. Substantial question no.1 is on the entitlement of assessee on the payment of broken period interest. The question is covered in favour of the assessee and against

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TVM vs. STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, TVM

Appeal stands dismissed

ITA/118/2009HC Kerala13 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

Section 260ASection 36(1)Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(2)

disallowed the claim of the assessee under I.T.A. No.118/2009 -3- Section 36(1)(viia). The assessee filed appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the appeal was allowed in part. In the appeal filed by the assessee before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, through Annexure-C order, the claim of the assessee under Section 36(1)(viia) was allowed

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,COCHIN. vs. M/S.PREMIER TYRES LTD., KALAMASSERRY

ITA/1358/2009HC Kerala23 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,COCHINFor Respondent: M/S.PREMIER TYRES LTD., KALAMASSERRY
Section 32(2)

disallowed the claim of assessee for set off of unabsorbed depreciation for the assessment years 1998-1999 and 2001-02. The assessee filed appeals against the order in Annexure A dated 31.1.2005 before the CIT (Appeals) and CIT (Appeals) through order in Annexure-B dated 16.8.2005 allowed the appeal of assessee and directed AO to allow carry forward

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PREMIER TYRES LTD.

ITA/1359/2009HC Kerala23 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,COCHINFor Respondent: M/S.PREMIER TYRES LTD., KALAMASSERRY
Section 32(2)

disallowed the claim of assessee for set off of unabsorbed depreciation for the assessment years 1998-1999 and 2001-02. The assessee filed appeals against the order in Annexure A dated 31.1.2005 before the CIT (Appeals) and CIT (Appeals) through order in Annexure-B dated 16.8.2005 allowed the appeal of assessee and directed AO to allow carry forward