BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “disallowance”+ Section 264clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai896Delhi688Bangalore256Chennai216Kolkata199Jaipur90Hyderabad75Ahmedabad66Karnataka66Calcutta36Pune35Rajkot33Chandigarh29Indore28Raipur26Surat21Cuttack19Lucknow18SC14Telangana14Nagpur12Cochin11Guwahati10Jodhpur7Allahabad6Kerala6Patna5Amritsar4Varanasi4Visakhapatnam3Dehradun3Ranchi2Rajasthan2Punjab & Haryana1Jabalpur1Agra1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 36(1)(viia)17Section 36(1)9Deduction6Section 260A4Section 36(1)(vii)4Section 36(2)4Limitation/Time-bar4Section 143(3)3Depreciation3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TRICHUR vs. M/S.DHANALAKSHMI BANK LTD.,TRICHUR

Appeal stands dismissed accordingly

ITA/304/2009HC Kerala13 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: M/S.DHANALAKSHMI BANK LTD.,TRICHURFor Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TRICHUR
Section 260Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(2)

disallowance of bad debts written off under section 36(1) (vii) amounting to Rs.22,78,703/-? ii) in allowing the bad written off under Section 36(1) (vii) amounting to Rs.22,78,703/- 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and also in the light of the decision of the Supreme Court in United Commercial

Disallowance3
Section 2602
Addition to Income2

THECOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,TRICHUR vs. CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LTD.,TRICHUR

Appeal stands dismissed

ITA/1439/2009HC Kerala13 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

Section 260ASection 36(1)Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(2)

disallowed? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the claim of bad debts and bad and doubtful debts is an allowable deduction? 3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the claim of depreciation on government securities is an allowable deduction?” I.T.A. No.1439/2009 -4- 3. The first and the second questions

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,TRICHUR vs. THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD.,TRICHUR.

Appeal stands dismissed

ITA/178/2009HC Kerala13 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

Section 260ASection 36(1)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(2)

disallowance of depreciation made by the Assessing Officer? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in holding that the investments made by the assessee in approved government securities form part of its stock in trade and therefore, the claim of depreciation on the revaluation of the securities was rightly claimed

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TRICHUR vs. THE DHANALAKSHMI BANK LTD.,

ITA/772/2009HC Kerala14 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 40A(7)

Section 40A(7) of the Income tax Act, 1961 the Tribunal is right in law in interfering with the disallowance of gratuity payable?” 3. Question no.1(a) deals with the claim on revaluation of current securities. The question is no more res integra and answered in favour of the assessee by this Court in the decision reported in Commissioner

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. THE DHANALAKSHMI BANK LTD.

Appeal stands dismissed accordingly

ITA/1065/2009HC Kerala13 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S.THE DHANALAKSHMI BANK LTD
Section 260Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(2)

Section 36(1)(vii) cannot be the claim of the assessee for bad debts u/s. 36(1) (vii), and the claim in the credit balance in the provision for bad and doubtful debts u/s 36(1)(viia) be disallowed” 3.Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the claim of bad debts and bad and doubtful debts

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD.

The appeal is allowed in part, answering question no

ITA/802/2009HC Kerala14 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 36(1)(viia)

264 ITR 545 (Ker) that for purpose of assessment cost price or market value, whichever is lower, should be adopted. Admittedly, market value is not known and so much so, some method has be adopted to fix the market value and thereafter only the lower of the cost price or the market value has to be taken for the purpose