BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 263clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,497Delhi1,623Kolkata1,087Bangalore832Chennai735Ahmedabad398Pune300Jaipur222Hyderabad217Rajkot177Chandigarh163Indore161Surat156Raipur152Karnataka87Visakhapatnam79Cochin63Cuttack62Lucknow62Panaji60Calcutta57Nagpur57Jodhpur40Amritsar38Agra28Patna28Telangana27Allahabad25Guwahati23Jabalpur13Ranchi12SC11Dehradun10Punjab & Haryana4Kerala4Varanasi4Orissa2Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 26310Section 115B3Section 36(1)(vii)3Section 682Section 143(3)2Section 260A2Section 112Disallowance2Deduction2Revision u/s 263

BHIMA JEWELLERS vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/15/2021HC Kerala25 Aug 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: M/S BHIMA JEWELLERSFor Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 115Section 115BSection 263Section 68Section 69Section 69ASection 69BSection 69CSection 69D

263 of the Act in the light of the binding judgment of the jurisdictional High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax v P.D.Abraham alias Appachan? 4. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and the Commissioner of Income Tax was correct in not noticing/adverting to Section 115BBE

2

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX(EXEMPTIONS) vs. M/S CHOICE FOUNDATION

ITA/180/2019HC Kerala11 Nov 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12Section 13(8)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 154Section 2(24)(iia)Section 260ASection 263

section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the assessment order dated 10/03/2015 is set aside with a direction to the Assessing Officer to redo the same afresh after considering all issues raised herein above and after affording an opportunity of being heard to the assessee.” 5. The assessee filed I.T.A No.20/Coch/2017 before the Tribunal

M/S.APOLLO TYRES LTD. vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/272/2013HC Kerala04 Aug 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: M/S.APOLLO TYRES LTDFor Respondent: THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 260A

disallow the claim of deduction. Learned counsel relied upon the decisions in SA Builders Ltd. V. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Chandigarh and Others [(2007) 288 ITR 1], Patnaik and Co. v. Commissioner of Income Tax [(1986) 27 Taxman 287) and Union of India I.T.A. No.272/13 -:8:- and Others v. Azadi Bachao Andolan and Others [(2003) 263

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. DHANALAXMI BANK LTD

ITA/59/2020HC Kerala04 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

For Appellant: M/S.DHANALAXMI BANK LTDFor Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36Section 36(1)(vii)

disallowing an amount of Rs.1,80,04,849/- under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, the said order was set aside by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Thrissur, by an order dated 18.12.2018 finding the assessment order as erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue. In the order of the Principal Commissioner, it was noticed that