BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

14 results for “disallowance”+ Section 153A(1)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,753Mumbai1,638Bangalore520Chennai492Hyderabad351Jaipur270Kolkata137Chandigarh119Ahmedabad117Amritsar116Rajkot78Pune75Indore75Nagpur73Cochin69Allahabad59Karnataka48Visakhapatnam47Guwahati42Surat39Raipur37Lucknow26Agra24Jodhpur23Cuttack17Kerala14Patna12Ranchi11Dehradun10Varanasi4SC2Jabalpur1Orissa1Telangana1Rajasthan1Calcutta1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 153A4Section 153C4Section 260A2Section 1322Section 142(1)2Reassessment2

K.M. FATHIMA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/53/2018HC Kerala11 Mar 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

disallowed as discussed above Rs. 1,50,000/- Rs.2,47,043/- Gross Total Income Rs.3,18,445/- Less: Deduction u/s 80L Rs. 12,000/- Total Income Rs.3,06,445/- Rounded off u/s 288A Rs.3,06,450/- 2.3 Thus, by the assessment order dated 30.12.2011, the actual income of the assessee was rounded up to Rs.3,06,450/- . For the other

K.M. FATHIMA, vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/76/2018HC Kerala11 Mar 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

disallowed as discussed above Rs. 1,50,000/- Rs.2,47,043/- Gross Total Income Rs.3,18,445/- Less: Deduction u/s 80L Rs. 12,000/- Total Income Rs.3,06,445/- Rounded off u/s 288A Rs.3,06,450/- 2.3 Thus, by the assessment order dated 30.12.2011, the actual income of the assessee was rounded up to Rs.3,06,450/- . For the other

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. GRACY BABU,

ITA/48/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

153A for the assessment years 2003-04 to 2008-09 and I.T.A.Noa.48, 46, 47, 49, 51, 54, 55, 56 & 68/20 & 6/21 :: 16 :: under Section 143(3) for the assessment year 2009-10 in relation to the persons who were searched, namely, Gracy Babu, Jose Thomas and P.J. Paulose, who were the heads of the respective trustee families. No assessments

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. JOSE THOMAS

ITA/46/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

153A for the assessment years 2003-04 to 2008-09 and I.T.A.Noa.48, 46, 47, 49, 51, 54, 55, 56 & 68/20 & 6/21 :: 16 :: under Section 143(3) for the assessment year 2009-10 in relation to the persons who were searched, namely, Gracy Babu, Jose Thomas and P.J. Paulose, who were the heads of the respective trustee families. No assessments

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. SMT.GRACY BABU,

ITA/54/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

153A for the assessment years 2003-04 to 2008-09 and I.T.A.Noa.48, 46, 47, 49, 51, 54, 55, 56 & 68/20 & 6/21 :: 16 :: under Section 143(3) for the assessment year 2009-10 in relation to the persons who were searched, namely, Gracy Babu, Jose Thomas and P.J. Paulose, who were the heads of the respective trustee families. No assessments

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. JOSE THOMAS,

ITA/56/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

153A for the assessment years 2003-04 to 2008-09 and I.T.A.Noa.48, 46, 47, 49, 51, 54, 55, 56 & 68/20 & 6/21 :: 16 :: under Section 143(3) for the assessment year 2009-10 in relation to the persons who were searched, namely, Gracy Babu, Jose Thomas and P.J. Paulose, who were the heads of the respective trustee families. No assessments

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. REENA JOSE

ITA/47/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

153A for the assessment years 2003-04 to 2008-09 and I.T.A.Noa.48, 46, 47, 49, 51, 54, 55, 56 & 68/20 & 6/21 :: 16 :: under Section 143(3) for the assessment year 2009-10 in relation to the persons who were searched, namely, Gracy Babu, Jose Thomas and P.J. Paulose, who were the heads of the respective trustee families. No assessments

K.R. RAZIYA, vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/61/2018HC Kerala14 Mar 2022

Bench: This Court Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act 1961 (For Short ‘The Act’). The Details Of Orders Of Assessment Etc. Are Stated In The Following Table:

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 153CSection 260A

1. The lease agreement do not have any legal validity as same is not executed in a stamp paper 2. The assessee does not have easement right (Pokkuvarau) in the said property and therefore it is not in the assessee's possession. ITA Nos.61 & 64/2018 -6- 3. The creditworthiness of lessee is not proved. 4. Sublease rent was paid

K.R.RAIZA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/64/2018HC Kerala14 Mar 2022

Bench: This Court Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act 1961 (For Short ‘The Act’). The Details Of Orders Of Assessment Etc. Are Stated In The Following Table:

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 153CSection 260A

1. The lease agreement do not have any legal validity as same is not executed in a stamp paper 2. The assessee does not have easement right (Pokkuvarau) in the said property and therefore it is not in the assessee's possession. ITA Nos.61 & 64/2018 -6- 3. The creditworthiness of lessee is not proved. 4. Sublease rent was paid

K.A.RAUF vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/60/2018HC Kerala10 Mar 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

153A for the slab years had taken up a few disallowances and further added to the assessee’s income. Disallowances or additions present in more than one assessment year and the same circumstances, consideration, and conclusion are stated in the orders under appeal. 5. The learned advocates appearing for the assessee and the Revenue stated that the issues between

K.A.RAUG vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/63/2018HC Kerala10 Mar 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

153A for the slab years had taken up a few disallowances and further added to the assessee’s income. Disallowances or additions present in more than one assessment year and the same circumstances, consideration, and conclusion are stated in the orders under appeal. 5. The learned advocates appearing for the assessee and the Revenue stated that the issues between

K.A.RAUF vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX

ITA/54/2018HC Kerala10 Mar 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

153A for the slab years had taken up a few disallowances and further added to the assessee’s income. Disallowances or additions present in more than one assessment year and the same circumstances, consideration, and conclusion are stated in the orders under appeal. 5. The learned advocates appearing for the assessee and the Revenue stated that the issues between

K.A.RAUF, vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX,

ITA/58/2018HC Kerala10 Mar 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

153A for the slab years had taken up a few disallowances and further added to the assessee’s income. Disallowances or additions present in more than one assessment year and the same circumstances, consideration, and conclusion are stated in the orders under appeal. 5. The learned advocates appearing for the assessee and the Revenue stated that the issues between

K.A.RAUF vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/56/2018HC Kerala10 Mar 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

153A for the slab years had taken up a few disallowances and further added to the assessee’s income. Disallowances or additions present in more than one assessment year and the same circumstances, consideration, and conclusion are stated in the orders under appeal. 5. The learned advocates appearing for the assessee and the Revenue stated that the issues between