BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 144(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,172Delhi1,560Kolkata694Bangalore550Chennai544Ahmedabad311Jaipur299Hyderabad244Pune195Surat154Rajkot125Cochin111Chandigarh110Amritsar109Indore109Visakhapatnam106Raipur103Lucknow75Nagpur54Allahabad48Cuttack47Karnataka36Calcutta36Patna35Jodhpur32Agra30Guwahati25Panaji22Telangana22Dehradun18SC16Jabalpur13Varanasi8Ranchi5Kerala2Punjab & Haryana2Rajasthan2H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Orissa1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 1482Section 70(3)2Deduction2

M/S. APPOLO TYRES LTD. vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

ITA/216/2013HC Kerala03 Aug 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

Section 10Section 10(38)Section 70(3)

disallowed the set-off claimed by the assessee I.T.A. No.216/2013 -6- under Sec 70 (3) of the Act. 4.2 The reasoning of the Assessing Officer is that whatever income is exempt under different clauses of Section 10, such income shall be removed from the purview of income before computation of the total income of an assessee. Hence, an income that

M/S. NILESHWAR RANGEKALLU CHETHU VYAVASAYA THOZHILALI SAHAKARANA SANGHAM vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/120/2019HC Kerala14 Mar 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

For Appellant: M/S. NILESHWAR RANGEKALLU CHETHU VYAVASAYA THOZHILALIFor Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 139(4)Section 148Section 80P

3. For the assessment year 2009-10, the appellant did not file any return of income. Believing that the appellant had income chargeable to tax that had escaped assessment, the Department issued a notice under Section 148 of the IT Act to the appellant on 6.2.2012 requiring the appellant to furnish a return of income within 30 days of receipt