BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “disallowance”+ Section 142(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,336Delhi3,071Kolkata1,227Bangalore1,133Chennai829Jaipur660Hyderabad542Ahmedabad533Pune500Visakhapatnam316Chandigarh314Indore286Rajkot264Surat244Cochin172Raipur136Lucknow115Amritsar111Nagpur90Guwahati77Patna73Jodhpur61Agra56Allahabad56Karnataka55Calcutta52Cuttack50Panaji46Ranchi39Telangana29SC22Dehradun21Jabalpur15Varanasi8Punjab & Haryana6Kerala5Orissa4Uttarakhand2Rajasthan2Tripura1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Himachal Pradesh1Bombay1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 153A4Section 153C4Section 1482Section 260A2Section 1322Section 142(1)2Reassessment2

M/S. NILESHWAR RANGEKALLU CHETHU VYAVASAYA THOZHILALI SAHAKARANA SANGHAM vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/120/2019HC Kerala14 Mar 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

For Appellant: M/S. NILESHWAR RANGEKALLU CHETHU VYAVASAYA THOZHILALIFor Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 139(4)Section 148Section 80P

disallowed on the ground that the claim for deduction had not been made in a valid return filed by the appellant in terms of the IT Act. It was the stand of the Assessing Officer that in view of the provisions of Section 80A(5) of the IT Act, the claim for deduction could not be considered

K.M. FATHIMA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/53/2018
HC Kerala
11 Mar 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

142(1) of the Act was issued to the assessee. The assessee objected to the notice as follows: (1) The residence “Shelter”, Jayanthi Nagar Colony, is not in the exclusive possession of Shri K A Rauf (2) The seized documents do not constitute valuable articles or things or books of accounts or documents belonging to the assessee herein. Therefore

K.M. FATHIMA, vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/76/2018HC Kerala11 Mar 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

142(1) of the Act was issued to the assessee. The assessee objected to the notice as follows: (1) The residence “Shelter”, Jayanthi Nagar Colony, is not in the exclusive possession of Shri K A Rauf (2) The seized documents do not constitute valuable articles or things or books of accounts or documents belonging to the assessee herein. Therefore

K.R. RAZIYA, vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/61/2018HC Kerala14 Mar 2022

Bench: This Court Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act 1961 (For Short ‘The Act’). The Details Of Orders Of Assessment Etc. Are Stated In The Following Table:

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 153CSection 260A

142(1) of the Act was issued to the assessee. 3. The assessee objected to the notice as follows: ITA Nos.61 & 64/2018 -5- (1) The residence “Shelter”, Jayanthi Nagar Colony, is not in the exclusive possession of Shri K A Rauf (2) The seized documents do not constitute valuable articles or things or books of accounts or documents belong

K.R.RAIZA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/64/2018HC Kerala14 Mar 2022

Bench: This Court Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act 1961 (For Short ‘The Act’). The Details Of Orders Of Assessment Etc. Are Stated In The Following Table:

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 153CSection 260A

142(1) of the Act was issued to the assessee. 3. The assessee objected to the notice as follows: ITA Nos.61 & 64/2018 -5- (1) The residence “Shelter”, Jayanthi Nagar Colony, is not in the exclusive possession of Shri K A Rauf (2) The seized documents do not constitute valuable articles or things or books of accounts or documents belong