BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 139(9)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,806Mumbai2,705Bangalore1,179Kolkata1,045Chennai974Jaipur650Pune464Hyderabad453Ahmedabad389Chandigarh309Indore237Raipur211Amritsar189Surat179Visakhapatnam154Nagpur149Cochin142Lucknow119Rajkot98Agra93Karnataka90Cuttack81Guwahati72Allahabad51Jodhpur43Calcutta42Telangana30Patna27SC26Panaji22Dehradun21Varanasi14Ranchi12Jabalpur11Kerala3Punjab & Haryana3Himachal Pradesh2Rajasthan1Tripura1Uttarakhand1Gauhati1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 194I5Deduction3Section 1482Section 40A(7)2Section 1942Section 402Section 194C2Disallowance2

M/S. NILESHWAR RANGEKALLU CHETHU VYAVASAYA THOZHILALI SAHAKARANA SANGHAM vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/120/2019HC Kerala14 Mar 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

For Appellant: M/S. NILESHWAR RANGEKALLU CHETHU VYAVASAYA THOZHILALIFor Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 139(4)Section 148Section 80P

disallowed on the ground that the claim for deduction had not been made in a valid return filed by the appellant in terms of the IT Act. It was the stand of the Assessing Officer that in view of the provisions of Section 80A(5) of the IT Act, the claim for deduction could not be considered

ALL KOSHYS ALL SPICES vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Appeal is allowed as above

ITA/23/2021HC Kerala12 Dec 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: ALL KOSHYS ALL SPICESFor Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 194Section 194CSection 194ISection 40

139/- paid/reimbursed by the assessee to M/s.Seven Ocean Shipping Company towards shipping charges attract TDS under section 194I of the Act? (3) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in holding that the assessee/appellant took the machinery (ship) on lease and paid hire charges for the same and therefore

M/S. INDITRADE CAPITAL LIMITED vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Appeal is allowed, matter remitted to Income Tax

ITA/1/2017HC Kerala15 Mar 2021

Bench: The Return Was Filed By The Assessee For The Subject Assessment Year. The Other Controversy Is

For Appellant: M/S. INDITRADE CAPITAL LIMITEDFor Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 28Section 36Section 40A(7)Section 43B

139 in respect of the ITA No.1 of 2017 5 previous year in which the liability to pay such sum was incurred as aforesaid and the evidence of such payment is furnished by the assessee along with such return.” 4. According to Adv.Jose Jacob, the assessee had, admittedly, paid the gratuity amount before the return was filed. The assesssee, hence