BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 139clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,156Delhi3,112Bangalore1,331Kolkata1,265Chennai1,137Jaipur742Pune532Hyderabad487Ahmedabad433Chandigarh340Indore285Cochin214Raipur212Visakhapatnam186Surat174Amritsar168Nagpur167Lucknow140Rajkot123Agra99Karnataka95Cuttack82Guwahati74Jodhpur58Calcutta45Allahabad38Patna36Telangana34Panaji28SC26Jabalpur23Dehradun23Ranchi21Varanasi15Kerala3Punjab & Haryana3Himachal Pradesh2Rajasthan1Tripura1Uttarakhand1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 194I5Deduction3Section 1482Section 40A(7)2Section 1942Section 402Section 194C2Disallowance2

M/S. NILESHWAR RANGEKALLU CHETHU VYAVASAYA THOZHILALI SAHAKARANA SANGHAM vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/120/2019HC Kerala14 Mar 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

For Appellant: M/S. NILESHWAR RANGEKALLU CHETHU VYAVASAYA THOZHILALIFor Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 139(4)Section 148Section 80P

139(4) and much after the due date mentioned in the notice under Section 148, the Assessing Officer treated the same as invalid and proceeded to complete the assessment in terms of Section 144 of the IT Act after hearing the representative of the appellant and verifying the books of account and other details called for by the Department. While

ALL KOSHYS ALL SPICES vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Appeal is allowed as above

ITA/23/2021HC Kerala12 Dec 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: ALL KOSHYS ALL SPICESFor Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 194Section 194CSection 194ISection 40

139/- paid to M/s.Seven Ocean Shipping Company as shipping charges. The reason for disallowance was stated to be non-deduction of TDS under section

M/S. INDITRADE CAPITAL LIMITED vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Appeal is allowed, matter remitted to Income Tax

ITA/1/2017HC Kerala15 Mar 2021

Bench: The Return Was Filed By The Assessee For The Subject Assessment Year. The Other Controversy Is

For Appellant: M/S. INDITRADE CAPITAL LIMITEDFor Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 28Section 36Section 40A(7)Section 43B

disallowance of payment of Rs.2,11,115/- by assessee to customers towards settlement of outstanding amount due to customer. The outstanding is stated by the assessee as resulting primarily on account of clerical errors and corrected upon reconciliation of entries between the parties. The provisions of law which have bearing are excerpted before hand. 3.1 Sec.40A(7) of the Income