BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “depreciation”+ Section 79clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,505Delhi1,213Bangalore563Chennai349Kolkata263Ahmedabad182Jaipur109Hyderabad90Pune79Raipur61Indore54Karnataka53Chandigarh52Lucknow36Amritsar34Visakhapatnam30Cochin30Rajkot25Cuttack24Ranchi19Surat18Nagpur14Telangana10Guwahati9SC9Agra7Varanasi7Jodhpur5Panaji5Calcutta4Patna4Rajasthan3Allahabad3Kerala3Jabalpur2Punjab & Haryana1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 32(1)(iia)6Section 32(1)(ii)4Section 143(3)3Deduction3Addition to Income3Section 92C2Depreciation2

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. APOLLO TYRES LTD

Appeal is allowed in part as indicated

ITA/44/2017HC Kerala22 Sept 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM

For Appellant: M/S. APOLLO TYRES LTDFor Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(5)Section 35Section 43ASection 92C

depreciation; the question is whether the claim of the assessee conforms the deduction permissible under Section 37(1) of the Act. In the facts and circumstances of this case, we are of the view that the preoperative expenses amounting to Rs.26,97,79

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. KITEX GARMENTS LTD.

ITA/138/2014HC Kerala05 Aug 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

Section 143(3)Section 32(1)(ii)Section 32(1)(iia)

depreciation in the subsequent year. 4.2 Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the assessee refers to and relies on the judgments in Commissioner of Income- tax, Madurai v. T P Textiles (P) Ltd.1 and Commissioner of Income-tax, Bangalore v. Rittal India (P) Ltd2 for sustaining the view taken by the Tribunal. It is also argued that the clarificatory amendment made

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, vs. M/S.APPOLLO TYRES LTD.,

ITA/184/2015HC Kerala02 Aug 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

Section 32(1)(ii)Section 32(1)(iia)

depreciation in the subsequent year. 4.2 Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the assessee refers to and relies on the judgments in Commissioner of Income- tax, Madurai v. T P Textiles (P) Ltd.1 and Commissioner of Income-tax, Bangalore v. Rittal India (P) Ltd2 for sustaining the view taken by the Tribunal. It is also argued that the clarificatory amendment made