BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “depreciation”+ Section 66clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,535Delhi1,416Bangalore514Chennai420Kolkata290Ahmedabad197Hyderabad119Jaipur115Chandigarh95Pune84Raipur65Visakhapatnam54Indore43Surat40Karnataka33Lucknow31Ranchi30Amritsar26Cochin25Rajkot21Cuttack20Jodhpur13Guwahati12Telangana12SC11Nagpur8Calcutta6Agra6Allahabad5Dehradun5Varanasi3Kerala3Patna2Panaji2Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 32(1)(iia)6Section 32(1)(ii)4Deduction3Depreciation2Addition to Income2

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. KITEX GARMENTS LTD.

ITA/138/2014HC Kerala05 Aug 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

Section 143(3)Section 32(1)(ii)Section 32(1)(iia)

depreciation in the subsequent year. 4.2 Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the assessee refers to and relies on the judgments in Commissioner of Income- tax, Madurai v. T P Textiles (P) Ltd.1 and Commissioner of Income-tax, Bangalore v. Rittal India (P) Ltd2 for sustaining the view taken by the Tribunal. It is also argued that the clarificatory amendment made

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, vs. M/S.APPOLLO TYRES LTD.,

ITA/184/2015HC Kerala02 Aug 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

Section 32(1)(ii)
Section 32(1)(iia)

depreciation in the subsequent year. 4.2 Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the assessee refers to and relies on the judgments in Commissioner of Income- tax, Madurai v. T P Textiles (P) Ltd.1 and Commissioner of Income-tax, Bangalore v. Rittal India (P) Ltd2 for sustaining the view taken by the Tribunal. It is also argued that the clarificatory amendment made

M/S. KUNNEL ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS (P) LTD vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Appeals are allowed and remanded with the observations as

ITA/66/2020HC Kerala14 Dec 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: M/S.KUNNEL ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS (P) LTDFor Respondent: THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 143(2)Section 36Section 43B

66 OF 2020 AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA NO.653/COCH/2019 OF I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH APPELLANT: M/S. KUNNEL ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS (P) LTD KOCHI-682011.(PAN.AABCK6154B) REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, MR M V ANTONY. BY ADVS. JOSEPH MARKOSE (SR.) SRI.V.ABRAHAM MARKOS SRI.ABRAHAM JOSEPH MARKOS SRI.ISAAC THOMAS SHRI.ALEXANDER JOSEPH MARKOS SHRI.SHARAD JOSEPH KODANTHARA RESPONDENT: THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME