BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “depreciation”+ Section 56(2)(ii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,527Delhi1,412Bangalore592Chennai370Ahmedabad356Kolkata269Hyderabad172Jaipur136Chandigarh123Indore89Pune74Raipur64Surat63Cochin62Amritsar57Lucknow43Karnataka38Cuttack33Rajkot31Visakhapatnam30Nagpur24SC22Jodhpur17Guwahati17Ranchi10Calcutta9Allahabad9Telangana8Agra7Dehradun7Kerala6Panaji6Varanasi5Patna2Rajasthan1Orissa1Gauhati1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 2634Section 115B3Section 682

BHIMA JEWELLERS vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/15/2021HC Kerala25 Aug 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: M/S BHIMA JEWELLERSFor Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 115Section 115BSection 263Section 68Section 69Section 69ASection 69BSection 69CSection 69D

56 of the Act was not considered. Referring to the decisions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in CIT v. D.P. Sandu Bros. Chembur Pvt. Ltd. MANU/SC/0070/2005 [2005] 273 ITR 1 (SC); [2005] 193 CTR (SC) 578 and in Untied Commercial Bank Ltd. v. CIT MANU/SC/0060/1957 (1957) 32 ITR 688 (SC) it was held that the Act does not envisage

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. REENA JOSE

ITA/47/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ii) Whether mere deduction of tax at source on an amount paid is sufficient to establish that alleged service is rendered, in respect of the amount paid ? I.T.A.Noa.48, 46, 47, 49, 51, 54, 55, 56 & 68/20 & 6/21 :: 30 :: (iii) Whether payment made to erstwhile trustees without services actually rendered by them, will fall outside the ambit of Sec.13

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. SMT.GRACY BABU,

ITA/54/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ii) Whether mere deduction of tax at source on an amount paid is sufficient to establish that alleged service is rendered, in respect of the amount paid ? I.T.A.Noa.48, 46, 47, 49, 51, 54, 55, 56 & 68/20 & 6/21 :: 30 :: (iii) Whether payment made to erstwhile trustees without services actually rendered by them, will fall outside the ambit of Sec.13

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. GRACY BABU,

ITA/48/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ii) Whether mere deduction of tax at source on an amount paid is sufficient to establish that alleged service is rendered, in respect of the amount paid ? I.T.A.Noa.48, 46, 47, 49, 51, 54, 55, 56 & 68/20 & 6/21 :: 30 :: (iii) Whether payment made to erstwhile trustees without services actually rendered by them, will fall outside the ambit of Sec.13

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. JOSE THOMAS

ITA/46/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ii) Whether mere deduction of tax at source on an amount paid is sufficient to establish that alleged service is rendered, in respect of the amount paid ? I.T.A.Noa.48, 46, 47, 49, 51, 54, 55, 56 & 68/20 & 6/21 :: 30 :: (iii) Whether payment made to erstwhile trustees without services actually rendered by them, will fall outside the ambit of Sec.13

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. JOSE THOMAS,

ITA/56/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ii) Whether mere deduction of tax at source on an amount paid is sufficient to establish that alleged service is rendered, in respect of the amount paid ? I.T.A.Noa.48, 46, 47, 49, 51, 54, 55, 56 & 68/20 & 6/21 :: 30 :: (iii) Whether payment made to erstwhile trustees without services actually rendered by them, will fall outside the ambit of Sec.13