BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “depreciation”+ Carry Forward of Lossesclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,991Delhi1,284Kolkata615Bangalore540Chennai471Ahmedabad316Pune164Jaipur149Raipur148Hyderabad128Chandigarh125Karnataka117Surat72Cuttack58Visakhapatnam51Indore47Rajkot46Ranchi41Amritsar38Nagpur38Cochin37Lucknow32Guwahati29SC28Jodhpur13Telangana12Varanasi7Kerala7Patna7Calcutta6Panaji4Jabalpur4Allahabad3Orissa2Punjab & Haryana2Rajasthan1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Dehradun1Gauhati1Himachal Pradesh1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 2634Section 115B3Disallowance3Section 92C2Section 143(3)2Section 682Deduction2Addition to Income2

BHIMA JEWELLERS vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/15/2021HC Kerala25 Aug 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: M/S BHIMA JEWELLERSFor Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 115Section 115BSection 263Section 68Section 69Section 69ASection 69BSection 69CSection 69D

depreciation allowance as against the income from other sources as contemplated under section 32(2). Therefore, it is not necessary that one should wait for the assessee to earn income from business so as to exhaust the carry forward of loss

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. APOLLO TYRES LTD

Appeal is allowed in part as indicated

ITA/44/2017HC Kerala22 Sept 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM

For Appellant: M/S. APOLLO TYRES LTDFor Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(5)Section 35Section 43ASection 92C

loss on forward contract as deduction : 98,10,765 ITA No.44/2017 -5- 7 Disallowance of claim of prepaid expenses as deduction : 5,15,34,726 2.2 We have heard learned Counsel Mr Christopher Abraham and Senior Advocate Mr Joseph Markos for the parties. 3. Substantial Question Nos.1, 1.1, 1.2: “1 Whether the Hon'ble Tribunal, in the facts and circumstances

M/S.APOLLO TYRES LTD. vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/26/2013HC Kerala29 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

loss would have been carried forward to next year and allowed accordingly. Simply because assessee has not claimed a particular deduction, it cannot be said to be a colourable device as envisaged by the decision of McDowell case. The deduction relates to payment of bonus which has actually been paid in the present year and deduction has been claimed

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PREMIER TYRES LTD.

ITA/929/2009HC Kerala19 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S.PREMIER TYRES LTD

forward, we bear in view the narrative considered by the authorities under the Act in the orders made by them and do not propose to state these circumstances in detail. The revenue categorized the receipt of lease rental as income from other sources, because the assessee was not actually manufacturing the tyres and selling the manufactured tyres in the market

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. PTL ENTERPRISES LIMITED,

ITA/483/2009HC Kerala19 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S.PREMIER TYRES LTD

forward, we bear in view the narrative considered by the authorities under the Act in the orders made by them and do not propose to state these circumstances in detail. The revenue categorized the receipt of lease rental as income from other sources, because the assessee was not actually manufacturing the tyres and selling the manufactured tyres in the market

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PREMIER TYRES LTD.

ITA/758/2009HC Kerala19 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S.PREMIER TYRES LTD

forward, we bear in view the narrative considered by the authorities under the Act in the orders made by them and do not propose to state these circumstances in detail. The revenue categorized the receipt of lease rental as income from other sources, because the assessee was not actually manufacturing the tyres and selling the manufactured tyres in the market

M/S.APOLLO TYRES LTD. vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/272/2013HC Kerala04 Aug 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: M/S.APOLLO TYRES LTDFor Respondent: THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 260A

depreciation in the value of foreign currency held by it, on conversion into another currency, such profit or loss are generally treated as profit and loss on revenue account. If, on the other hand, the foreign currency is held as a capital asset or as a fixed asset, such profit or loss would be of a capital nature. I.T.A. No.272/13