BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 9clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai2,844Mumbai2,805Delhi2,348Kolkata1,466Pune1,443Bangalore1,317Hyderabad948Ahmedabad838Jaipur706Surat449Chandigarh436Nagpur381Raipur374Visakhapatnam325Patna305Indore289Amritsar277Lucknow266Karnataka261Cochin259Rajkot235Cuttack167Panaji137Agra83Calcutta68Guwahati65Dehradun62SC57Jodhpur53Telangana41Allahabad34Jabalpur31Ranchi30Varanasi30Rajasthan9Orissa7Kerala7Himachal Pradesh4Punjab & Haryana3Andhra Pradesh2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Gauhati1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1

Key Topics

Section 3510Section 13(2)3Section 35(1)(i)2Deduction2Disallowance2

ENANALLOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (1 AND C)

In the result, this Original Petition is allowed by quashing

ITA/73/2018HC Kerala19 Feb 2020

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Section 13(2)Section 13(4)Section 17

condoned the delay by entertaining the Securitisation Application, contrary O.P (DRT) No.73 of 2018 16 to the fundamental principles of judicial procedure, the petition as framed and filed is maintainable. For this purpose, he placed reliance on the judgment in Commissioner of Income Tax and Others v. Chhabildass Agarwal reported in (2014) 1 SCC 603. 8. As against this, learned

APOLLO TYRES LTD. vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/225/2019HC Kerala13 Sept 2021

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM

Bench:
Section 35Section 35(1)(i)

9. After having considered the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, we are inclined to accept the submissions made by Mr Chandhiok on behalf of the respondent. While it may be true that, initially, the petitioner had obtained approval right upto 31.03.2010, but that approval would be relatable only to Section 35(2AB) Before a company is entitled

APOLLO TYRES LTD vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/238/2019HC Kerala13 Sept 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM

Section 35Section 35(1)(i)

9. After having considered the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, we are inclined to accept the submissions made by Mr Chandhiok on behalf of the respondent. While it may be true that, initially, the petitioner had obtained approval right upto 31.03.2010, but that approval would be relatable only to Section 35(2AB) Before a company is entitled

HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/258/2019HC Kerala13 Oct 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS (P) LTDFor Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Section 133A of the Act is unauthorized. On the pen drives, the objection raised by the assessee is that the material and pen drive must be eschewed and alternatively, there is no evidence on record to show that the alleged data, projected in the notice ITA Nos.247/2019, 255/2019, 259/2019, 256/2019, 260/2019, 258/2019, 10/2020, 3/2020, 13/2020, 4/2020, 8/2020, 11/2020, 12/2020, 16/2020

HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS (P) LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX

ITA/255/2019HC Kerala13 Oct 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS (P) LTDFor Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Section 133A of the Act is unauthorized. On the pen drives, the objection raised by the assessee is that the material and pen drive must be eschewed and alternatively, there is no evidence on record to show that the alleged data, projected in the notice ITA Nos.247/2019, 255/2019, 259/2019, 256/2019, 260/2019, 258/2019, 10/2020, 3/2020, 13/2020, 4/2020, 8/2020, 11/2020, 12/2020, 16/2020

HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/256/2019HC Kerala13 Oct 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS (P) LTDFor Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Section 133A of the Act is unauthorized. On the pen drives, the objection raised by the assessee is that the material and pen drive must be eschewed and alternatively, there is no evidence on record to show that the alleged data, projected in the notice ITA Nos.247/2019, 255/2019, 259/2019, 256/2019, 260/2019, 258/2019, 10/2020, 3/2020, 13/2020, 4/2020, 8/2020, 11/2020, 12/2020, 16/2020

HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS (P) LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/259/2019HC Kerala13 Oct 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS (P) LTDFor Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Section 133A of the Act is unauthorized. On the pen drives, the objection raised by the assessee is that the material and pen drive must be eschewed and alternatively, there is no evidence on record to show that the alleged data, projected in the notice ITA Nos.247/2019, 255/2019, 259/2019, 256/2019, 260/2019, 258/2019, 10/2020, 3/2020, 13/2020, 4/2020, 8/2020, 11/2020, 12/2020, 16/2020