Search: condonation of delay | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 5clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai4,152 Mumbai4,014 Delhi3,275 Kolkata2,191 Pune1,822 Bangalore1,683 Ahmedabad1,396 Hyderabad1,191 Jaipur930 Patna747 Surat639 Chandigarh572 Indore533 Nagpur508 Cochin464 Visakhapatnam425 Raipur411 Lucknow395 Rajkot334 Amritsar326 Karnataka301 Cuttack286 Panaji175 Agra159 Calcutta125 Guwahati104 Dehradun103 Jodhpur82 Allahabad72 SC63 Jabalpur63 Ranchi59 Telangana48 Varanasi37 Andhra Pradesh17 Rajasthan11 Orissa10 Kerala7 Punjab & Haryana6 Himachal Pradesh5 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2 Gauhati1 R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1 A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1 VIKRAMAJIT SEN SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1 DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1

Key Topics

Section 3510 Section 13(2)3 Section 35(1)(i)2 Deduction2 Disallowance2

ENANALLOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (1 AND C)

In the result, this Original Petition is allowed by quashing

ITA/73/2018HC Kerala19 Feb 2020

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Section 13(2)Section 13(4)Section 17

condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act in an application under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act. In that

APOLLO TYRES LTD. vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/225/2019HC Kerala13 Sept 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM

Section 35(1)(i)

5. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the assessee informs the Court that the Special Leave Petition (SLP), ITA Nos.225 & 238/2019 -11- filed against the judgment in W.P.(C) No.13338/2009 with delay condonation petition, was pending during the assessment proceedings. Subsequently, the Supreme Court since did not condone the delay, the SLP was dismissed. Therefore, we are of the view

APOLLO TYRES LTD vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/238/2019HC Kerala13 Sept 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM

Section 35Section 35(1)(i)

5. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the assessee informs the Court that the Special Leave Petition (SLP), ITA Nos.225 & 238/2019 -11- filed against the judgment in W.P.(C) No.13338/2009 with delay condonation petition, was pending during the assessment proceedings. Subsequently, the Supreme Court since did not condone the delay, the SLP was dismissed. Therefore, we are of the view

HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/258/2019HC Kerala13 Oct 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS (P) LTDFor Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Section 133A of the Act is unauthorized. On the pen drives, the objection raised by the assessee is that the material and pen drive must be eschewed and alternatively, there is no evidence on record to show that the alleged data, projected in the notice ITA Nos.247/2019, 255/2019, 259/2019, 256/2019, 260/2019, 258/2019, 10/2020, 3/2020, 13/2020, 4/2020, 8/2020, 11/2020, 12/2020, 16/2020

HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS (P) LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX

ITA/255/2019HC Kerala13 Oct 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS (P) LTDFor Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Section 133A of the Act is unauthorized. On the pen drives, the objection raised by the assessee is that the material and pen drive must be eschewed and alternatively, there is no evidence on record to show that the alleged data, projected in the notice ITA Nos.247/2019, 255/2019, 259/2019, 256/2019, 260/2019, 258/2019, 10/2020, 3/2020, 13/2020, 4/2020, 8/2020, 11/2020, 12/2020, 16/2020

HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/256/2019HC Kerala13 Oct 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS (P) LTDFor Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Section 133A of the Act is unauthorized. On the pen drives, the objection raised by the assessee is that the material and pen drive must be eschewed and alternatively, there is no evidence on record to show that the alleged data, projected in the notice ITA Nos.247/2019, 255/2019, 259/2019, 256/2019, 260/2019, 258/2019, 10/2020, 3/2020, 13/2020, 4/2020, 8/2020, 11/2020, 12/2020, 16/2020

HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS (P) LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/259/2019HC Kerala13 Oct 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS (P) LTDFor Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Section 133A of the Act is unauthorized. On the pen drives, the objection raised by the assessee is that the material and pen drive must be eschewed and alternatively, there is no evidence on record to show that the alleged data, projected in the notice ITA Nos.247/2019, 255/2019, 259/2019, 256/2019, 260/2019, 258/2019, 10/2020, 3/2020, 13/2020, 4/2020, 8/2020, 11/2020, 12/2020, 16/2020