Search: condonation of delay | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 14clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai1,701 Delhi1,646 Mumbai1,561 Kolkata944 Pune865 Bangalore835 Hyderabad602 Jaipur507 Ahmedabad494 Nagpur317 Raipur292 Surat289 Chandigarh268 Karnataka232 Visakhapatnam189 Indore185 Amritsar164 Cochin145 Cuttack132 Lucknow118 Rajkot116 Panaji103 Patna67 Calcutta62 SC50 Jodhpur38 Guwahati37 Agra34 Telangana30 Dehradun30 Allahabad26 Varanasi19 Jabalpur15 Ranchi9 Rajasthan7 Orissa6 Kerala5 Himachal Pradesh4 Andhra Pradesh4 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2 R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1 Punjab & Haryana1 A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1 DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1 Gauhati1

Key Topics

ENANALLOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (1 AND C)

In the result, this Original Petition is allowed by quashing

ITA/73/2018HC Kerala19 Feb 2020

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Section 13(2)Section 13(4)Section 17

condonation of delay came to be rejected by holding that Section 5 of the Limitation Act is not applicable and the benefit of Section 14

HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/258/2019HC Kerala13 Oct 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS (P) LTD

For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Section 133A of the Act is unauthorized. On the pen drives, the objection raised by the assessee is that the material and pen drive must be eschewed and alternatively, there is no evidence on record to show that the alleged data, projected in the notice ITA Nos.247/2019, 255/2019, 259/2019, 256/2019, 260/2019, 258/2019, 10/2020, 3/2020, 13/2020, 4/2020, 8/2020, 11/2020, 12/2020, 16/2020

HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/256/2019HC Kerala13 Oct 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS (P) LTDFor Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Section 133A of the Act is unauthorized. On the pen drives, the objection raised by the assessee is that the material and pen drive must be eschewed and alternatively, there is no evidence on record to show that the alleged data, projected in the notice ITA Nos.247/2019, 255/2019, 259/2019, 256/2019, 260/2019, 258/2019, 10/2020, 3/2020, 13/2020, 4/2020, 8/2020, 11/2020, 12/2020, 16/2020

HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS (P) LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/259/2019HC Kerala13 Oct 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS (P) LTDFor Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Section 133A of the Act is unauthorized. On the pen drives, the objection raised by the assessee is that the material and pen drive must be eschewed and alternatively, there is no evidence on record to show that the alleged data, projected in the notice ITA Nos.247/2019, 255/2019, 259/2019, 256/2019, 260/2019, 258/2019, 10/2020, 3/2020, 13/2020, 4/2020, 8/2020, 11/2020, 12/2020, 16/2020

HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS (P) LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX

ITA/255/2019HC Kerala13 Oct 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS (P) LTDFor Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Section 133A of the Act is unauthorized. On the pen drives, the objection raised by the assessee is that the material and pen drive must be eschewed and alternatively, there is no evidence on record to show that the alleged data, projected in the notice ITA Nos.247/2019, 255/2019, 259/2019, 256/2019, 260/2019, 258/2019, 10/2020, 3/2020, 13/2020, 4/2020, 8/2020, 11/2020, 12/2020, 16/2020