Search: condonation of delay | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 1clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai4,198 Mumbai4,131 Delhi3,280 Kolkata2,237 Pune1,878 Bangalore1,698 Ahmedabad1,517 Hyderabad1,221 Jaipur997 Patna769 Surat660 Cochin611 Chandigarh585 Indore562 Nagpur521 Visakhapatnam457 Lucknow427 Raipur412 Rajkot355 Amritsar331 Karnataka329 Cuttack323 Panaji201 Agra166 Calcutta162 Guwahati110 Dehradun104 Jodhpur98 Jabalpur91 Allahabad81 SC65 Ranchi62 Telangana54 Varanasi38 Andhra Pradesh21 Orissa11 Punjab & Haryana10 Rajasthan10 Kerala7 Himachal Pradesh4 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2 R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1 Gauhati1 DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1 A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1 VIKRAMAJIT SEN SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1

Key Topics

Section 3510 Section 13(2)3 Section 35(1)(i)2 Deduction2 Disallowance2

ENANALLOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (1 AND C)

In the result, this Original Petition is allowed by quashing

ITA/73/2018HC Kerala19 Feb 2020

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Section 13(2)Section 13(4)Section 17

delay in filing an appeal under Section 18(1) of the SARFEASI Act can be condoned under the provisions of Section

APOLLO TYRES LTD. vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/225/2019HC Kerala13 Sept 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM

Section 35(1)(i)

1), it must also enter into an agreement with the prescribed authority for co-operation in such research and development facility and for audit of accounts maintained for that facility. This is specifically stipulated in Clause (3) of Section 35(2AB) of the said Act. We find that the agreement was entered into only on 21.08.2008 when the petitioner made

APOLLO TYRES LTD vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/238/2019HC Kerala13 Sept 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM

Section 35Section 35(1)(i)

1), it must also enter into an agreement with the prescribed authority for co-operation in such research and development facility and for audit of accounts maintained for that facility. This is specifically stipulated in Clause (3) of Section 35(2AB) of the said Act. We find that the agreement was entered into only on 21.08.2008 when the petitioner made

HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/258/2019HC Kerala13 Oct 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS (P) LTDFor Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Section 133A of the Act is unauthorized. On the pen drives, the objection raised by the assessee is that the material and pen drive must be eschewed and alternatively, there is no evidence on record to show that the alleged data, projected in the notice ITA Nos.247/2019, 255/2019, 259/2019, 256/2019, 260/2019, 258/2019, 10/2020, 3/2020, 13/2020, 4/2020, 8/2020, 11/2020, 12/2020, 16/2020

HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS (P) LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX

ITA/255/2019HC Kerala13 Oct 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS (P) LTDFor Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Section 133A of the Act is unauthorized. On the pen drives, the objection raised by the assessee is that the material and pen drive must be eschewed and alternatively, there is no evidence on record to show that the alleged data, projected in the notice ITA Nos.247/2019, 255/2019, 259/2019, 256/2019, 260/2019, 258/2019, 10/2020, 3/2020, 13/2020, 4/2020, 8/2020, 11/2020, 12/2020, 16/2020

HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/256/2019HC Kerala13 Oct 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS (P) LTDFor Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Section 133A of the Act is unauthorized. On the pen drives, the objection raised by the assessee is that the material and pen drive must be eschewed and alternatively, there is no evidence on record to show that the alleged data, projected in the notice ITA Nos.247/2019, 255/2019, 259/2019, 256/2019, 260/2019, 258/2019, 10/2020, 3/2020, 13/2020, 4/2020, 8/2020, 11/2020, 12/2020, 16/2020

HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS (P) LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/259/2019HC Kerala13 Oct 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: HILLWOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS (P) LTDFor Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Section 133A of the Act is unauthorized. On the pen drives, the objection raised by the assessee is that the material and pen drive must be eschewed and alternatively, there is no evidence on record to show that the alleged data, projected in the notice ITA Nos.247/2019, 255/2019, 259/2019, 256/2019, 260/2019, 258/2019, 10/2020, 3/2020, 13/2020, 4/2020, 8/2020, 11/2020, 12/2020, 16/2020