BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 260Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi248Karnataka155Mumbai130Bangalore60Chennai34Kolkata33Calcutta27Telangana18Jaipur15Indore9Ahmedabad7Nagpur6Chandigarh5Hyderabad4Kerala4SC4Pune4Lucknow3Orissa2Cochin2J&K2Varanasi1Amritsar1Cuttack1Gauhati1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 408Section 80P(2)(a)6Section 273B4Section 260A3Section 194C3Section 194H3Section 69C3Deduction3TDS3Section 271C

SUDARSANAN P.S vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/70/2017HC Kerala06 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 194Section 194CSection 194HSection 260ASection 40Section 69C

TDS under Section 194H. Yet ITA NO. 70 OF 2017 3 another sum of Rs.3,26,380/- was added to gross total income under Section 69C of the Act, since the assessee failed to furnish any details to prove the source. 3. On appeal, the Commissioner Appeals allowed the appeal in part and directed deletion of the dis-allowance

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. USHA MURUGAN

2
ITA/18/2017HC Kerala23 Jun 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

Section 143(2)Section 260A

260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'). The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Kottayam (for short 'the Revenue') is the appellant in these Tax Appeals. M/s.Meenakshy Enterprises, a proprietary concern, represented by T. Murugan, since deceased, represented by his wife Usha Murugan, is the respondent in these appeals (for short referred to as 'the assessee

M/S.INDIA COFFEE BOARD WORKERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/86/2015HC Kerala10 Aug 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: M/S.INDIA COFFEE BOARD WORKERS CO-OPERATIVEFor Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 260ASection 40Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

TDS was not applied on rent payments made totalling Rs.1,81,247/- and the latter amount had not been disallowed and assessed under Section 40(a)(ia) r.w.s.194J; (b) Interest incomes received from the assessee's members totalling Rs.16,93,3334/- was omitted to be taxed”. 2. Appellant had filed a return of income for the year in question declaring

M/S. SUBSCRIBERS CHITS (P) LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Appeals stand allowed accordingly

ITA/34/2016HC Kerala23 Mar 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

Section 271CSection 273B

TDS)1 argues that the questions framed in the instant tax appeals are no more res integra and are covered in favour of the appellant/assessee. To bring home his arguments, he invites our attention to the question considered by the Full Bench in Lakshadweep Development Corporation Ltd supra which reads thus: “The pertinent question sought to be answered