BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 928clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai156Delhi115Bangalore45Ahmedabad36Kolkata24Hyderabad22Pune20Chennai12Jaipur10Cuttack9Chandigarh8Visakhapatnam4Karnataka3Cochin2Surat2Ranchi1SC1Orissa1Telangana1Indore1

Key Topics

Section 2603Section 260A2Transfer Pricing2Comparables/TP2

M/S ALTAIR ENGINEERING INDIA PVT LTD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/224/2011HC Karnataka09 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260Section 260ASection 92C

SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN. SET ASIDE THE Date of Judgment 09-07-2018 I.T.A.No.224/2011 M/s. Altair Engineering India Pvt. Ltd., Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax 2/9 APPELLATE ORDER DATED 14/03/2011 IN ITA No.1184/Bang/2010 ANNEXURE-A. THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR FINAL DISPOSAL, THIS

PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S QUANTECH GLOBAL SERVICES LTD

ITA/439/2018HC Karnataka04 Feb 2021

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,V SRISHANANDA

Section 143(2)
Section 260
Section 268

Pricing Officer (TPO) vide letter dated 30.11.2009 and during the course of proceeding before the TPO, assessee vide its letter dated 09.06.2010 categorically stated that its registered office was at Hyderabad and it stood merged with Wipro Ltd., pursuant to the scheme of amalgamation approved by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh vide order dated 21.02.2008 and scheme of amalgamation

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-7 vs. M/S TEKTRONIX (INDIA) PVT LTD

ITA/284/2018HC Karnataka30 Aug 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260Section 260A

Price?” 3. The learned Tribunal, after discussing the rival contentions of both the Appellants-Revenue and the Respondent-Assessee, has given the following findings:- Regarding substantial question of law No.1:- “Infosys Ltd: 11. It was submitted before us by the Ld. AR that Infosys Ltd is not functionally comparable with the assessee as it is clear from the annual report