BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 54Fclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai92Delhi65Hyderabad26Bangalore26Jaipur23Chennai20Ahmedabad17Pune14Indore13Kolkata11Cochin10Karnataka8Surat8Chandigarh7Nagpur6Agra6Cuttack5Visakhapatnam4Telangana4SC3Calcutta2Ranchi2Patna1Raipur1Allahabad1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 26017Section 54F8Capital Gains6Section 260A5Section 483Section 553Section 1473Section 453Section 1482Addition to Income

PROF. P.N. SHETTY vs. OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

WA/3031/2019HC Karnataka09 Oct 2019

Bench: The

Section 139Section 142Section 4Section 45Section 54F

Section 54F of the said Act. 3. The appellant purchased a premises for the price of Rs.21,32,470/- on 20th August, 2013 which was before the 3 expiry of three years from the date of transfer

PR COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX-6 vs. M R KODANDRAM

Appeals stand dismissed

WTA/11/2017HC Karnataka18 Oct 2019

RAVI MALIMATH,ASHOK S.KINAGI

2
Deduction2
Bench:
Section 260Section 260A

54F, 54G and 54H shall be chargeable to income tax under the head capital gains and by legal fiction it is deemed to be the income of the previous year in which the transfer took place. The mode of computation as prescribed under Section 48 would indicate that the income chargeable under the head capital gains shall be computed

THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SMT SAROJINI M KUSHE

Appeal stands dismissed

ITA/475/2016HC Karnataka01 Dec 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

Section 260Section 260ASection 48Section 50CSection 50D

54F, 54G and 54H shall be chargeable to income tax under the head capital gains and by legal fiction it is deemed to be the income of the previous year in which the transfer took place. The mode of computation as prescribed under Section 48 would indicate that the income chargeable under the head capital gains shall be computed

CHITTHARANJAN A DASANNACHARYA vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-V

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA/153/2014HC Karnataka23 Oct 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Section 143(3)Section 2(14)Section 2(47)Section 260Section 260ASection 54F

price of shares and market value of shares on the date of exercise of 'income from short term capital 6 gains'. The claims for deduction under Section 54F was disallowed. The assessee thereupon approached the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) who by an order dated 31.10.2011 dismissed the appeal on merits. However, the interest levied under Section 234B

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S ASSOCIATED ELECTRONIC AND ELCTRICAL

The appeal stands dismissed

ITA/358/2009HC Karnataka18 Dec 2015

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET SARAN

Section 260Section 48Section 55Section 55(2)(a)

54F, 54G and 54H be chargeable to income-tax under the head “Capital gains” and shall be deemed to be the income of the previous year in which the transfer took place.” 17 12. Section 48 of the Act reads thus: “48. Mode of Computation The income chargeable under the head “Capital gains” shall be computed, by deducting from

M/S WIPRO LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/881/2008HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

Section 145A of the Income- tax Act which was inserted with effect from assessment year 1999-2000. The said provision states that the valuation of stock should include the amount of any tax duty, cess or fee - 94 - actually paid or incurred to bring the goods to its present location and condition. The Department has followed a consistent stand

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S WIPRO LTD

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/211/2009HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

Section 145A of the Income- tax Act which was inserted with effect from assessment year 1999-2000. The said provision states that the valuation of stock should include the amount of any tax duty, cess or fee - 94 - actually paid or incurred to bring the goods to its present location and condition. The Department has followed a consistent stand

SRI B V S MURTHY vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

The appeal is disposed of

ITA/397/2010HC Karnataka19 Feb 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,RAVI V HOSMANI

Section 147Section 148Section 17(2)(iii)Section 260Section 260A

price on the date of the grant. Clause 72 (iiia) which was incorporated in the statute book with effect from 01.04.2000 to 01.04.2001 provided that perquisite is the value of any specified security allotted or transferred directly or indirectly by any person free of cost or at a concessional rate to an individual who has or has been in employment