BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “section 68”+ Section 69Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,418Delhi934Jaipur342Kolkata247Chandigarh156Bangalore146Chennai143Ahmedabad138Indore115Hyderabad111Surat107Pune97Visakhapatnam60Rajkot51Raipur43Lucknow37Guwahati31Nagpur28Agra25Cochin23Jodhpur20Amritsar19Ranchi16Jabalpur7Dehradun6Cuttack5Calcutta5Allahabad4SC4Karnataka4Varanasi3Patna3Panaji1Kerala1Telangana1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 139(4)4Section 260A3Section 139(1)3Section 683Section 2603Section 143(2)3Section 115B3Section 44A2Addition to Income2

SHRI NARAYAN RAO HEBRI vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeal stands dismissed

ITA/166/2025HC Karnataka20 Feb 2026

Bench: S.G.PANDIT,K. V. ARAVIND

Section 115BSection 133ASection 143(2)Section 260Section 260A

sections 68, 69, 69A, 69B, 69C & 69D of the IT Act and (ii) the Learned Assessing Officer levied tax & surcharge

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI N LEELA KUMAR

ITA/384/2007HC Karnataka25 Nov 2013

N.KUMAR,RATHNAKALA

Bench:
Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 158Section 260A

sections 68, 69, 69A, 69B and 69C shall, so far as may be, - 12 - apply and references to "financial

SHRI HARISH WADHWA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,

Appeal is allowed

ITA/224/2020HC Karnataka27 Jan 2021

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,V SRISHANANDA

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 260Section 44ASection 68Section 69Section 69C

68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961? (iv) Whether the Tribunal was right in law in confirming the addition of Rs.28,71,972/- (credit card expenses) towards unexplained expenditure under Section 69C

SRI MOHAN M MEHARWADE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

The appeal Is allowed in part

ITA/5022/2010HC Karnataka20 Jan 2012

Bench: K.SREEDHAR RAO,A.S.BOPANNA

Section 68

68 of the Act as discussed above 2. Unexplained marriage expenditure Rs. 2.35.000 treated as income u Is 69C of the Act as discussed above 3 Income from lv Network Rs 65 000 4. hiconie fiom Other Sources - R.’. 2.00.000 UndLsc’Io%ed interest hicome as discussed abm e TOTAL It’. 16.11.890 5 rnpianec credit