BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

385 results for “section 68”+ Section 55(2)(ac)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka385Mumbai196Delhi161Hyderabad126Chennai59Calcutta50Bangalore48Kolkata42Jaipur28Chandigarh26Ahmedabad23Surat21Indore15SC13Telangana13Rajkot8Patna8Cochin5Rajasthan4Varanasi4Agra3Nagpur3Lucknow2Raipur2Amritsar2Pune2Andhra Pradesh1Visakhapatnam1Orissa1Cuttack1ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1

Key Topics

Section 10516Section 35F12Section 2608Section 174Penalty4Addition to Income3Section 4332

NIRMALA BAGODI vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/41506/2017HC Karnataka13 Dec 2017

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice G. Narendar Writ Petition No.41506/2017 (Apmc) C/W Writ Petition No.41507/2017 (Apmc)

Section 17

68. It cannot be disputed that the legislation in question is a remedial and beneficial legislation. As it aims at remedying the unequal bargaining power as exists between the soulful farmer and the merchant class. In otherworlds it is an attempt by the legislature to place the farmer and the trader on the same stratum. Mere perusal of the provisions

SRI CHITURI DURGA RAO vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/41507/2017HC Karnataka13 Dec 2017

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice G. Narendar Writ Petition No.41506/2017 (Apmc) C/W Writ Petition No.41507/2017 (Apmc)

Section 17

68. It cannot be disputed that the legislation in question is a remedial and beneficial legislation. As it aims at remedying the unequal bargaining power as exists between the soulful farmer and the merchant class. In otherworlds it is an attempt by the legislature to place the farmer and the trader on the same stratum. Mere perusal of the provisions

Showing 1–20 of 385 · Page 1 of 20

...

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S GOLDMAN SACHS SERVICES PVT LTD

ITA/29/2019HC Karnataka10 Jun 2021

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice V. Srishananda Civil Revision Petition No.29/2019 Between

Section 115Section 37(2)

AC No.70/2014. It is contented that learned Arbitrator after receiving the objection statement from respondent Nos.1 to 4, framed a preliminary issue regarding the arbitrability of the dispute, in the light of the averments made in the claim petition and also counter- allegations of serious nature in the objection statement filed by respondent Nos.1 to 4. 19. After hearing

N RAGHAVENDRA MURTHY vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/22658/2015HC Karnataka19 Jun 2020

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice S. Sunil Dutt Yadav

AC, HRBR 1st Block, Kalyan Nagar, Bangalore - 560 043. … Petitioner (By Sri. S. Kalyan Basavaraj, Advocate) And: 1. State of Karnataka Department of Revenue, By its Principal Secretary, M. S. Building, Dr. Ambedkar Veedhi, Bangalore - 560 001. 2. Deputy Commissioner Mysore District, Mysore - 570 001. 3. The Tahasildar Mysore Taluk, Mysore - 570 001. 4. The Mysore Urban Development Authority Mysore

MS.SHRIYA ANIL vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/17127/2021HC Karnataka08 Nov 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

AC AND ETC. IN W.P.No.12071/2021: BETWEEN: 1. NIKHITA BHASKAR GOWDA, D/O BHASKAR G, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, R/AT NO.569 11TH MAIN ROAD, LALITH MAHAL NAGAR, MYSURU-570 011. 2. SAMAHITHA RAJEEVALOCHANA, S/O RAJEEVALOCHANA G N, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, R/AT NO.0/1, PADMASHREE, IST B CROSS, 5TH BLOCK, K KRISHNAIAH LAYOUT, BANASHANKARI III STAGE, BENGALURU-560 085. 3. JOHN

ANAGHA MURALIDHARAN vs. THE UNION OF INDIA

WP/12722/2021HC Karnataka08 Nov 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

AC AND ETC. IN W.P.No.12071/2021: BETWEEN: 1. NIKHITA BHASKAR GOWDA, D/O BHASKAR G, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, R/AT NO.569 11TH MAIN ROAD, LALITH MAHAL NAGAR, MYSURU-570 011. 2. SAMAHITHA RAJEEVALOCHANA, S/O RAJEEVALOCHANA G N, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, R/AT NO.0/1, PADMASHREE, IST B CROSS, 5TH BLOCK, K KRISHNAIAH LAYOUT, BANASHANKARI III STAGE, BENGALURU-560 085. 3. JOHN

MR ASHWIN SRIDHAR vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/11951/2021HC Karnataka08 Nov 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

AC AND ETC. IN W.P.No.12071/2021: BETWEEN: 1. NIKHITA BHASKAR GOWDA, D/O BHASKAR G, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, R/AT NO.569 11TH MAIN ROAD, LALITH MAHAL NAGAR, MYSURU-570 011. 2. SAMAHITHA RAJEEVALOCHANA, S/O RAJEEVALOCHANA G N, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, R/AT NO.0/1, PADMASHREE, IST B CROSS, 5TH BLOCK, K KRISHNAIAH LAYOUT, BANASHANKARI III STAGE, BENGALURU-560 085. 3. JOHN

YASHASWINI DHARMALAPA VISHWANATH vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/12419/2021HC Karnataka08 Nov 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

AC AND ETC. IN W.P.No.12071/2021: BETWEEN: 1. NIKHITA BHASKAR GOWDA, D/O BHASKAR G, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, R/AT NO.569 11TH MAIN ROAD, LALITH MAHAL NAGAR, MYSURU-570 011. 2. SAMAHITHA RAJEEVALOCHANA, S/O RAJEEVALOCHANA G N, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, R/AT NO.0/1, PADMASHREE, IST B CROSS, 5TH BLOCK, K KRISHNAIAH LAYOUT, BANASHANKARI III STAGE, BENGALURU-560 085. 3. JOHN

NIKHITA BHASKAR GOWDA vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/12071/2021HC Karnataka08 Nov 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

AC AND ETC. IN W.P.No.12071/2021: BETWEEN: 1. NIKHITA BHASKAR GOWDA, D/O BHASKAR G, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, R/AT NO.569 11TH MAIN ROAD, LALITH MAHAL NAGAR, MYSURU-570 011. 2. SAMAHITHA RAJEEVALOCHANA, S/O RAJEEVALOCHANA G N, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, R/AT NO.0/1, PADMASHREE, IST B CROSS, 5TH BLOCK, K KRISHNAIAH LAYOUT, BANASHANKARI III STAGE, BENGALURU-560 085. 3. JOHN

MR.VIVEK NAIR vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/13081/2021HC Karnataka08 Nov 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

AC AND ETC. IN W.P.No.12071/2021: BETWEEN: 1. NIKHITA BHASKAR GOWDA, D/O BHASKAR G, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, R/AT NO.569 11TH MAIN ROAD, LALITH MAHAL NAGAR, MYSURU-570 011. 2. SAMAHITHA RAJEEVALOCHANA, S/O RAJEEVALOCHANA G N, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, R/AT NO.0/1, PADMASHREE, IST B CROSS, 5TH BLOCK, K KRISHNAIAH LAYOUT, BANASHANKARI III STAGE, BENGALURU-560 085. 3. JOHN

ALEKHYA PONNEKANTI vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/11504/2021HC Karnataka08 Nov 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

AC AND ETC. IN W.P.No.12071/2021: BETWEEN: 1. NIKHITA BHASKAR GOWDA, D/O BHASKAR G, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, R/AT NO.569 11TH MAIN ROAD, LALITH MAHAL NAGAR, MYSURU-570 011. 2. SAMAHITHA RAJEEVALOCHANA, S/O RAJEEVALOCHANA G N, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, R/AT NO.0/1, PADMASHREE, IST B CROSS, 5TH BLOCK, K KRISHNAIAH LAYOUT, BANASHANKARI III STAGE, BENGALURU-560 085. 3. JOHN

MR MUKUND RAO vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/12337/2021HC Karnataka08 Nov 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

AC AND ETC. IN W.P.No.12071/2021: BETWEEN: 1. NIKHITA BHASKAR GOWDA, D/O BHASKAR G, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, R/AT NO.569 11TH MAIN ROAD, LALITH MAHAL NAGAR, MYSURU-570 011. 2. SAMAHITHA RAJEEVALOCHANA, S/O RAJEEVALOCHANA G N, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, R/AT NO.0/1, PADMASHREE, IST B CROSS, 5TH BLOCK, K KRISHNAIAH LAYOUT, BANASHANKARI III STAGE, BENGALURU-560 085. 3. JOHN

ARUSHI MISHRA vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/12849/2021HC Karnataka08 Nov 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

AC AND ETC. IN W.P.No.12071/2021: BETWEEN: 1. NIKHITA BHASKAR GOWDA, D/O BHASKAR G, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, R/AT NO.569 11TH MAIN ROAD, LALITH MAHAL NAGAR, MYSURU-570 011. 2. SAMAHITHA RAJEEVALOCHANA, S/O RAJEEVALOCHANA G N, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, R/AT NO.0/1, PADMASHREE, IST B CROSS, 5TH BLOCK, K KRISHNAIAH LAYOUT, BANASHANKARI III STAGE, BENGALURU-560 085. 3. JOHN

M/S SSJV PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. M/S ALLAHABAD BANK

In the result, the writ appeals are disposed in

WA/545/2020HC Karnataka29 Jan 2021

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,R. NATARAJ

Section 17Section 31Section 4

ACS – Vasundhara” Phase-II, Site Nos.2 and 3, near Kodihalli, Bengaluru. They are shown as item No.1 of the petition schedule property. Petitioner No.2 on behalf of petitioner No.1 had signed a Letter of Undertaking regarding creation of mortgage of item No.1 of the schedule property on 21.11.2008. In addition, petitioner No.2 created charge on immovable property, i.e., coffee estate

SRI U M RAMESH RAO vs. UNION BANK OF INDIA

In the result, the writ appeals are disposed in

WA/538/2020HC Karnataka29 Jan 2021

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,R. NATARAJ

Section 17Section 31Section 4

ACS – Vasundhara” Phase-II, Site Nos.2 and 3, near Kodihalli, Bengaluru. They are shown as item No.1 of the petition schedule property. Petitioner No.2 on behalf of petitioner No.1 had signed a Letter of Undertaking regarding creation of mortgage of item No.1 of the schedule property on 21.11.2008. In addition, petitioner No.2 created charge on immovable property, i.e., coffee estate

SRI KEMPANNA vs. THE COMMISSIONER

WP/54790/2016HC Karnataka27 Sept 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar W.P. No.51929/2014 C/W W.P.Nos.42063/2012, 30494/2013, 42671/2013, 638/2014, 797/2014, 1089/2014, 3211/2014, 3389/2014, 6180/2014, 10356/2014, 12014/2014, 12015/2014, 13043/2014, 13045/2014, 13206/2014, 13207/2014, 13398/2014, 13774/2014, 14149/2014, 14161/2014, 14494/2014, 14502/2014, 14521/2014, 14689/2014, 16646/2014, 17051/2014, 17594/2014, 19729/2014, 21158/2014, 23897/2014, 28861/2014, 30731/2014, 31723/2014, 33774/2014, 33777/2014, 34084/2014, 34259/2014, 34272/2014, 34391/2014, 35204/2014, 35243/2014, 35247/2014, 35305/2014, 35609/2014, 36164/2014, 36166/2014, 36489/2014, 36525/2014, 36971/2014, 37446/2014, 38055/2014, 38463/2014, 38471/2014, 38472/2014, 38661/2014, 38753/2014, 39383/2014, 39633/2014, 39832/2014, 40204/2014, 40379/2014, 41394/2014, 41422/2014, 41427/2014, 41428/2014, 41858/2014, 43815/2014, 43963/2014, 44306/2014, 44527/2014, 44742/2014, 44835/2014, 45486/2014, 46766/2014, 47103/2014, 47105/2014, 47106/2014, 47107/2014, 47608/2014, 47731/2014, 47821/2014, 47860/2014, 47913/2014, 48577/2014, 48880/2014, 49567/2014, 50260/2014, 50533/2014, 51294/2014, 51930/2014, 51931/2014, 51932/2014, 52760/2014, 53854/2014, 54059/2014, 54083/2014, 54236/2014

SECTION 24(2) OF RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT 2013. IN W.P.NO.797/2014: BETWEEN: SRI.N.RAMAIAH S/O. LATE NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/A NO.708, HEANNUR MAIN ROAD, KAVERI SERVICE STATION, KALYAN NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 043. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. G. PAPI REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA

SMT. MAJELLA C. THOMAS vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/56023/2016HC Karnataka27 Sept 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar W.P. No.51929/2014 C/W W.P.Nos.42063/2012, 30494/2013, 42671/2013, 638/2014, 797/2014, 1089/2014, 3211/2014, 3389/2014, 6180/2014, 10356/2014, 12014/2014, 12015/2014, 13043/2014, 13045/2014, 13206/2014, 13207/2014, 13398/2014, 13774/2014, 14149/2014, 14161/2014, 14494/2014, 14502/2014, 14521/2014, 14689/2014, 16646/2014, 17051/2014, 17594/2014, 19729/2014, 21158/2014, 23897/2014, 28861/2014, 30731/2014, 31723/2014, 33774/2014, 33777/2014, 34084/2014, 34259/2014, 34272/2014, 34391/2014, 35204/2014, 35243/2014, 35247/2014, 35305/2014, 35609/2014, 36164/2014, 36166/2014, 36489/2014, 36525/2014, 36971/2014, 37446/2014, 38055/2014, 38463/2014, 38471/2014, 38472/2014, 38661/2014, 38753/2014, 39383/2014, 39633/2014, 39832/2014, 40204/2014, 40379/2014, 41394/2014, 41422/2014, 41427/2014, 41428/2014, 41858/2014, 43815/2014, 43963/2014, 44306/2014, 44527/2014, 44742/2014, 44835/2014, 45486/2014, 46766/2014, 47103/2014, 47105/2014, 47106/2014, 47107/2014, 47608/2014, 47731/2014, 47821/2014, 47860/2014, 47913/2014, 48577/2014, 48880/2014, 49567/2014, 50260/2014, 50533/2014, 51294/2014, 51930/2014, 51931/2014, 51932/2014, 52760/2014, 53854/2014, 54059/2014, 54083/2014, 54236/2014

SECTION 24(2) OF RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT 2013. IN W.P.NO.797/2014: BETWEEN: SRI.N.RAMAIAH S/O. LATE NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/A NO.708, HEANNUR MAIN ROAD, KAVERI SERVICE STATION, KALYAN NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 043. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. G. PAPI REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA

SRI. MOHAMMED MUJAHID ALI vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/31723/2014HC Karnataka27 Sept 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar W.P. No.51929/2014 C/W W.P.Nos.42063/2012, 30494/2013, 42671/2013, 638/2014, 797/2014, 1089/2014, 3211/2014, 3389/2014, 6180/2014, 10356/2014, 12014/2014, 12015/2014, 13043/2014, 13045/2014, 13206/2014, 13207/2014, 13398/2014, 13774/2014, 14149/2014, 14161/2014, 14494/2014, 14502/2014, 14521/2014, 14689/2014, 16646/2014, 17051/2014, 17594/2014, 19729/2014, 21158/2014, 23897/2014, 28861/2014, 30731/2014, 31723/2014, 33774/2014, 33777/2014, 34084/2014, 34259/2014, 34272/2014, 34391/2014, 35204/2014, 35243/2014, 35247/2014, 35305/2014, 35609/2014, 36164/2014, 36166/2014, 36489/2014, 36525/2014, 36971/2014, 37446/2014, 38055/2014, 38463/2014, 38471/2014, 38472/2014, 38661/2014, 38753/2014, 39383/2014, 39633/2014, 39832/2014, 40204/2014, 40379/2014, 41394/2014, 41422/2014, 41427/2014, 41428/2014, 41858/2014, 43815/2014, 43963/2014, 44306/2014, 44527/2014, 44742/2014, 44835/2014, 45486/2014, 46766/2014, 47103/2014, 47105/2014, 47106/2014, 47107/2014, 47608/2014, 47731/2014, 47821/2014, 47860/2014, 47913/2014, 48577/2014, 48880/2014, 49567/2014, 50260/2014, 50533/2014, 51294/2014, 51930/2014, 51931/2014, 51932/2014, 52760/2014, 53854/2014, 54059/2014, 54083/2014, 54236/2014

SECTION 24(2) OF RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT 2013. IN W.P.NO.797/2014: BETWEEN: SRI.N.RAMAIAH S/O. LATE NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/A NO.708, HEANNUR MAIN ROAD, KAVERI SERVICE STATION, KALYAN NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 043. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. G. PAPI REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA

SRI H M KUMAR vs. BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

WP/8731/2018HC Karnataka27 Sept 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar W.P. No.51929/2014 C/W W.P.Nos.42063/2012, 30494/2013, 42671/2013, 638/2014, 797/2014, 1089/2014, 3211/2014, 3389/2014, 6180/2014, 10356/2014, 12014/2014, 12015/2014, 13043/2014, 13045/2014, 13206/2014, 13207/2014, 13398/2014, 13774/2014, 14149/2014, 14161/2014, 14494/2014, 14502/2014, 14521/2014, 14689/2014, 16646/2014, 17051/2014, 17594/2014, 19729/2014, 21158/2014, 23897/2014, 28861/2014, 30731/2014, 31723/2014, 33774/2014, 33777/2014, 34084/2014, 34259/2014, 34272/2014, 34391/2014, 35204/2014, 35243/2014, 35247/2014, 35305/2014, 35609/2014, 36164/2014, 36166/2014, 36489/2014, 36525/2014, 36971/2014, 37446/2014, 38055/2014, 38463/2014, 38471/2014, 38472/2014, 38661/2014, 38753/2014, 39383/2014, 39633/2014, 39832/2014, 40204/2014, 40379/2014, 41394/2014, 41422/2014, 41427/2014, 41428/2014, 41858/2014, 43815/2014, 43963/2014, 44306/2014, 44527/2014, 44742/2014, 44835/2014, 45486/2014, 46766/2014, 47103/2014, 47105/2014, 47106/2014, 47107/2014, 47608/2014, 47731/2014, 47821/2014, 47860/2014, 47913/2014, 48577/2014, 48880/2014, 49567/2014, 50260/2014, 50533/2014, 51294/2014, 51930/2014, 51931/2014, 51932/2014, 52760/2014, 53854/2014, 54059/2014, 54083/2014, 54236/2014

SECTION 24(2) OF RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT 2013. IN W.P.NO.797/2014: BETWEEN: SRI.N.RAMAIAH S/O. LATE NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/A NO.708, HEANNUR MAIN ROAD, KAVERI SERVICE STATION, KALYAN NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 043. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. G. PAPI REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA

SHADRACH vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/53428/2017HC Karnataka27 Sept 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar W.P. No.51929/2014 C/W W.P.Nos.42063/2012, 30494/2013, 42671/2013, 638/2014, 797/2014, 1089/2014, 3211/2014, 3389/2014, 6180/2014, 10356/2014, 12014/2014, 12015/2014, 13043/2014, 13045/2014, 13206/2014, 13207/2014, 13398/2014, 13774/2014, 14149/2014, 14161/2014, 14494/2014, 14502/2014, 14521/2014, 14689/2014, 16646/2014, 17051/2014, 17594/2014, 19729/2014, 21158/2014, 23897/2014, 28861/2014, 30731/2014, 31723/2014, 33774/2014, 33777/2014, 34084/2014, 34259/2014, 34272/2014, 34391/2014, 35204/2014, 35243/2014, 35247/2014, 35305/2014, 35609/2014, 36164/2014, 36166/2014, 36489/2014, 36525/2014, 36971/2014, 37446/2014, 38055/2014, 38463/2014, 38471/2014, 38472/2014, 38661/2014, 38753/2014, 39383/2014, 39633/2014, 39832/2014, 40204/2014, 40379/2014, 41394/2014, 41422/2014, 41427/2014, 41428/2014, 41858/2014, 43815/2014, 43963/2014, 44306/2014, 44527/2014, 44742/2014, 44835/2014, 45486/2014, 46766/2014, 47103/2014, 47105/2014, 47106/2014, 47107/2014, 47608/2014, 47731/2014, 47821/2014, 47860/2014, 47913/2014, 48577/2014, 48880/2014, 49567/2014, 50260/2014, 50533/2014, 51294/2014, 51930/2014, 51931/2014, 51932/2014, 52760/2014, 53854/2014, 54059/2014, 54083/2014, 54236/2014

SECTION 24(2) OF RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT 2013. IN W.P.NO.797/2014: BETWEEN: SRI.N.RAMAIAH S/O. LATE NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/A NO.708, HEANNUR MAIN ROAD, KAVERI SERVICE STATION, KALYAN NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 043. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. G. PAPI REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA