BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “section 68”+ Section 35Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi59Mumbai36Bangalore16Hyderabad10Chennai6Pune5Karnataka5Kolkata4Ahmedabad3Chandigarh2Telangana1Cochin1Jaipur1SC1

Key Topics

Section 10516Section 35F12Penalty4Section 812

M/S HEWLETT PACKARD INDIA SALES PVT.LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/21492/2015HC Karnataka07 Oct 2015

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mrs.Justice B.V.Nagarathna

Section 105Section 35F

68 :- 24. However, the right to file an appeal must be distinguished from the procedure necessarily to be followed while exercising the right to file an appeal. Sections 35A

PRESTIGE GARDEN CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/54017/2014HC Karnataka07 Oct 2015

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mrs.Justice B.V.Nagarathna

Section 105Section 35F

68 :- 24. However, the right to file an appeal must be distinguished from the procedure necessarily to be followed while exercising the right to file an appeal. Sections 35A

EXORA BUSINESS PARKS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/54018/2014HC Karnataka07 Oct 2015

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mrs.Justice B.V.Nagarathna

Section 105Section 35F

68 :- 24. However, the right to file an appeal must be distinguished from the procedure necessarily to be followed while exercising the right to file an appeal. Sections 35A

M/S HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/10559/2015HC Karnataka07 Oct 2015

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mrs.Justice B.V.Nagarathna

Section 105Section 35F

68 :- 24. However, the right to file an appeal must be distinguished from the procedure necessarily to be followed while exercising the right to file an appeal. Sections 35A

SMT. M R PRABHAVATHY vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

WTA/1/2019HC Karnataka04 Mar 2020

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice K.Natarajan Election Petition No.1 Of 2019 Connected With Election Petition No.2 Of 2019

Section 81

Section 33A of RP Act and 106 he has committed corrupt practice of bribery as contemplated under Sections 123(1)(A), 123(1)(B), 123(7), 123(7)(b), 123(vii)(d), 123(7)(h) and Section 123(8), 123(3), 3A and 123(6) of R.P. Act ? The petitioner in E.P. No.2/2019 has contended that respondent