Search: section 68

2 results for “section 68”+ Section 32Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai85 Delhi40 Bangalore11 Kolkata6 SC6 Indore6 Guwahati5 Chennai5 Pune4 Ahmedabad3 Visakhapatnam3 Telangana2 Karnataka2 Jaipur1 Cuttack1 Cochin1 Surat1

Key Topics

Section 353

M/S TEJAS NETWORKS LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, I proceed to pass the following:

WP/7004/2014HC Karnataka24 Apr 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 143(3)Section 144C(1)Section 144C(13)Section 35Section 35(1)(i)

68,301/- claimed by the assessee as 100% deduction under Section 35(1)(i) also came to be disallowed. Said order of assessment dated 31.01.2013 is impugned in the present writ petition. 3. I have heard the arguments of Sriyuths N Venkataraman, learned Senior counsel appearing on 5 behalf of Sri K.R.Vasudevan, for petitioner, Sri K.V.Aravind, learned Senior panel

M/S TEJAS NETWORKS LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ULTRATECH CEMENT LIMITED vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS

M/S TEJAS NETWORKS LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ULTRATECH CEMENT LIMITED vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS