M/S TEJAS NETWORKS LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
In the result, I proceed to pass the following:
WP/7004/2014HC Karnataka24 Apr 2015
Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar
Section 143(3)Section 144C(1)Section 144C(13)Section 35Section 35(1)(i)
68,301/- claimed by the
assessee as 100% deduction under Section 35(1)(i) also
came to be disallowed. Said order of assessment dated
31.01.2013 is impugned in the present writ petition.
3.
I have heard the arguments of Sriyuths
N Venkataraman, learned Senior counsel appearing on
5
behalf
of
Sri
K.R.Vasudevan,
for
petitioner,
Sri
K.V.Aravind, learned Senior panel
