SMT. M R PRABHAVATHY vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice K.Natarajan Election Petition No.1 Of 2019 Connected With Election Petition No.2 Of 2019

Section 33A of RP Act and 106 he has committed corrupt practice of bribery as contemplated under Sections 123(1)(A), 123(1)(B), 123(7), 123(7)(b), 123(vii)(d), 123(7)(h) and Section 123(8), 123(3), 3A and 123(6) of R.P. Act ? The petitioner in E.P. No.2/2019 has contended that respondent

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER vs. M/S OBULAPURAM MINING

Bench: K.SOMASHEKAR,UMESH M ADIGA

251 ITR 84 SC is of the view that the word substantial qualifies the term question of law, it means a question having substance, essential, real or sound worth, important or considerable. The substantial question of law on which an appeal shall be heard need not necessarily be a question of law of general importance. To be substantial, a question

M/S FIDELITY BUSINESS SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

251(1)(a) of the Act has power to dispose of an appeal against the Order of assessment and he may Date of Judgment :23-07-2018 I.T.A.No.512/2017 M/s. Fidelity Business Services India Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax, & Anr. 79/86 confirm or reduce or enhance or annul the assessment. The higher and final Appellate Authority under

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

251 measuring 6 acres 18 guntas of Halagevaderahalli Village, Bangalore South Taluk, gave up from acquisition of land by conniving with the landlords and officials of other Department. In W.P.No.26396/2015 (Crime No.39/2015) pertaining to land in Sy.Nos.5/1 and 6/3 measuring 1 acre 17 guntas of Bilekahalli village, Bangalore South Taluk. The petitioner herein with a malafide intention

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

251 measuring 6 acres 18 guntas of Halagevaderahalli Village, Bangalore South Taluk, gave up from acquisition of land by conniving with the landlords and officials of other Department. In W.P.No.26396/2015 (Crime No.39/2015) pertaining to land in Sy.Nos.5/1 and 6/3 measuring 1 acre 17 guntas of Bilekahalli village, Bangalore South Taluk. The petitioner herein with a malafide intention

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

251 measuring 6 acres 18 guntas of Halagevaderahalli Village, Bangalore South Taluk, gave up from acquisition of land by conniving with the landlords and officials of other Department. In W.P.No.26396/2015 (Crime No.39/2015) pertaining to land in Sy.Nos.5/1 and 6/3 measuring 1 acre 17 guntas of Bilekahalli village, Bangalore South Taluk. The petitioner herein with a malafide intention

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

251 measuring 6 acres 18 guntas of Halagevaderahalli Village, Bangalore South Taluk, gave up from acquisition of land by conniving with the landlords and officials of other Department. In W.P.No.26396/2015 (Crime No.39/2015) pertaining to land in Sy.Nos.5/1 and 6/3 measuring 1 acre 17 guntas of Bilekahalli village, Bangalore South Taluk. The petitioner herein with a malafide intention

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

251 measuring 6 acres 18 guntas of Halagevaderahalli Village, Bangalore South Taluk, gave up from acquisition of land by conniving with the landlords and officials of other Department. In W.P.No.26396/2015 (Crime No.39/2015) pertaining to land in Sy.Nos.5/1 and 6/3 measuring 1 acre 17 guntas of Bilekahalli village, Bangalore South Taluk. The petitioner herein with a malafide intention

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

251 measuring 6 acres 18 guntas of Halagevaderahalli Village, Bangalore South Taluk, gave up from acquisition of land by conniving with the landlords and officials of other Department. In W.P.No.26396/2015 (Crime No.39/2015) pertaining to land in Sy.Nos.5/1 and 6/3 measuring 1 acre 17 guntas of Bilekahalli village, Bangalore South Taluk. The petitioner herein with a malafide intention

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

251 measuring 6 acres 18 guntas of Halagevaderahalli Village, Bangalore South Taluk, gave up from acquisition of land by conniving with the landlords and officials of other Department. In W.P.No.26396/2015 (Crime No.39/2015) pertaining to land in Sy.Nos.5/1 and 6/3 measuring 1 acre 17 guntas of Bilekahalli village, Bangalore South Taluk. The petitioner herein with a malafide intention

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

251 measuring 6 acres 18 guntas of Halagevaderahalli Village, Bangalore South Taluk, gave up from acquisition of land by conniving with the landlords and officials of other Department. In W.P.No.26396/2015 (Crime No.39/2015) pertaining to land in Sy.Nos.5/1 and 6/3 measuring 1 acre 17 guntas of Bilekahalli village, Bangalore South Taluk. The petitioner herein with a malafide intention

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

251 measuring 6 acres 18 guntas of Halagevaderahalli Village, Bangalore South Taluk, gave up from acquisition of land by conniving with the landlords and officials of other Department. In W.P.No.26396/2015 (Crime No.39/2015) pertaining to land in Sy.Nos.5/1 and 6/3 measuring 1 acre 17 guntas of Bilekahalli village, Bangalore South Taluk. The petitioner herein with a malafide intention

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

251 measuring 6 acres 18 guntas of Halagevaderahalli Village, Bangalore South Taluk, gave up from acquisition of land by conniving with the landlords and officials of other Department. In W.P.No.26396/2015 (Crime No.39/2015) pertaining to land in Sy.Nos.5/1 and 6/3 measuring 1 acre 17 guntas of Bilekahalli village, Bangalore South Taluk. The petitioner herein with a malafide intention

SHRI B S YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

251 measuring 6 acres 18 guntas of Halagevaderahalli Village, Bangalore South Taluk, gave up from acquisition of land by conniving with the landlords and officials of other Department. In W.P.No.26396/2015 (Crime No.39/2015) pertaining to land in Sy.Nos.5/1 and 6/3 measuring 1 acre 17 guntas of Bilekahalli village, Bangalore South Taluk. The petitioner herein with a malafide intention

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

251 measuring 6 acres 18 guntas of Halagevaderahalli Village, Bangalore South Taluk, gave up from acquisition of land by conniving with the landlords and officials of other Department. In W.P.No.26396/2015 (Crime No.39/2015) pertaining to land in Sy.Nos.5/1 and 6/3 measuring 1 acre 17 guntas of Bilekahalli village, Bangalore South Taluk. The petitioner herein with a malafide intention

SATISH N vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Raghvendra S. Chauhan

Section 93 of the Act, namely "a canvasser…solicits the customer for such vehicle (public service vehicle) ”. Therefore, an aggregator is covered under Section 93 of the Act. 53. Of course, Mr. Sajan Poovayya, the learned Senior counsel, has argued that an aggregator does not go on to the road to solicit customers. But in the Digital

SYNDICATE BANK vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is allowed in

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,R. NATARAJ

251/- being 7.5% of the total income. The assessee was selected for scrutiny and the Assessing Officer passed an order of assessment dated 22.02.2013 and recomputed the total income of the appellant by restricting the deduction claimed under Section 36(1)(viia) of the Act to the provision made in the books of accounts and set off the loss

THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S ATRIA WIND (KADAMBUR) PVT LTD

Bench: CHIEF JUSTICE,C M JOSHI

Section 153A of the Act was issued. The Assessing Officer [AO] determined the total income of the assessee at ₹1,89,11,81,757/-. The said determination was based on an addition of a sum of ₹1,91,95,68,251