SWARNA SOUHARDA CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE LTD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice S. Sunil Dutt Yadav

68,267/- as being profits and gains of its business after having claimed deduction of Rs.16,54,031/- under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”, for short). 3 3. It is further submitted that in the assessment proceedings, the second respondent has disallowed deduction with respect to interest on investment of Rs.13

HOGETHOPPALU KOTRESHA SETTY SAROJAMMA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

Accordingly, review petition is allowed

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice S. Sunil Dutt Yadav Review Petition No.185/2021 In Writ Petition No.5065/2018 (T-It) Between: Hogethoppalu Kotresha Setty Sarojamma, W/O Mr. H. Kotresha Setty, Aged About 68 Years, Residing At Basaveshwara Complex, M.H. Road, Chitradurga - 577 501.

68 years, Residing at Basaveshwara Complex, M.H. Road, Chitradurga - 577 501. … Petitioner (By Sri Harish V.S., Advocate) And: The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Tamatkal Road, Medehalli, Chitradurga - 577 502. … Respondent (By Sri K.V. Aravind, Advocate) 2 This Review Petition is filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC, praying to review the judgment dated 20.02.2018 passed by this

SRI U M RAMESH RAO vs. UNION BANK OF INDIA

In the result, the writ appeals are disposed in

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,R. NATARAJ

Section 31(i) of the SARFAESI Act. 56. Before proceeding further, it would be useful to refer to Articles 246 of the Constitution. Article 246 deals with subject matter of laws made by Parliament and by the Legislatures of States. -: 68

M/S SSJV PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. M/S ALLAHABAD BANK

In the result, the writ appeals are disposed in

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,R. NATARAJ

Section 31(i) of the SARFAESI Act. 56. Before proceeding further, it would be useful to refer to Articles 246 of the Constitution. Article 246 deals with subject matter of laws made by Parliament and by the Legislatures of States. -: 68

SMT. M R PRABHAVATHY vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice K.Natarajan Election Petition No.1 Of 2019 Connected With Election Petition No.2 Of 2019

Section 33A of RP Act and 106 he has committed corrupt practice of bribery as contemplated under Sections 123(1)(A), 123(1)(B), 123(7), 123(7)(b), 123(vii)(d), 123(7)(h) and Section 123(8), 123(3), 3A and 123(6) of R.P. Act ? The petitioner in E.P. No.2/2019 has contended that respondent

ARUSHI MISHRA vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

246(1) r/w Article 11 & Entry- 17, List-1, Schedule VII of the Constitution; the said Entry speaks of "Citizenship, naturalization and aliens"; originally, this Act dealt with citizenship and its acquisition and denudation by specified modes; however, in the course of time, few amendments have been effected empowering the Central Govt. to evolve a policy for the grant

ALEKHYA PONNEKANTI vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

246(1) r/w Article 11 & Entry- 17, List-1, Schedule VII of the Constitution; the said Entry speaks of "Citizenship, naturalization and aliens"; originally, this Act dealt with citizenship and its acquisition and denudation by specified modes; however, in the course of time, few amendments have been effected empowering the Central Govt. to evolve a policy for the grant

MR ASHWIN SRIDHAR vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

246(1) r/w Article 11 & Entry- 17, List-1, Schedule VII of the Constitution; the said Entry speaks of "Citizenship, naturalization and aliens"; originally, this Act dealt with citizenship and its acquisition and denudation by specified modes; however, in the course of time, few amendments have been effected empowering the Central Govt. to evolve a policy for the grant

MR.VIVEK NAIR vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

246(1) r/w Article 11 & Entry- 17, List-1, Schedule VII of the Constitution; the said Entry speaks of "Citizenship, naturalization and aliens"; originally, this Act dealt with citizenship and its acquisition and denudation by specified modes; however, in the course of time, few amendments have been effected empowering the Central Govt. to evolve a policy for the grant

MR MUKUND RAO vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

246(1) r/w Article 11 & Entry- 17, List-1, Schedule VII of the Constitution; the said Entry speaks of "Citizenship, naturalization and aliens"; originally, this Act dealt with citizenship and its acquisition and denudation by specified modes; however, in the course of time, few amendments have been effected empowering the Central Govt. to evolve a policy for the grant

NIKHITA BHASKAR GOWDA vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

246(1) r/w Article 11 & Entry- 17, List-1, Schedule VII of the Constitution; the said Entry speaks of "Citizenship, naturalization and aliens"; originally, this Act dealt with citizenship and its acquisition and denudation by specified modes; however, in the course of time, few amendments have been effected empowering the Central Govt. to evolve a policy for the grant

MS.SHRIYA ANIL vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

246(1) r/w Article 11 & Entry- 17, List-1, Schedule VII of the Constitution; the said Entry speaks of "Citizenship, naturalization and aliens"; originally, this Act dealt with citizenship and its acquisition and denudation by specified modes; however, in the course of time, few amendments have been effected empowering the Central Govt. to evolve a policy for the grant

ANAGHA MURALIDHARAN vs. THE UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

246(1) r/w Article 11 & Entry- 17, List-1, Schedule VII of the Constitution; the said Entry speaks of "Citizenship, naturalization and aliens"; originally, this Act dealt with citizenship and its acquisition and denudation by specified modes; however, in the course of time, few amendments have been effected empowering the Central Govt. to evolve a policy for the grant

YASHASWINI DHARMALAPA VISHWANATH vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

246(1) r/w Article 11 & Entry- 17, List-1, Schedule VII of the Constitution; the said Entry speaks of "Citizenship, naturalization and aliens"; originally, this Act dealt with citizenship and its acquisition and denudation by specified modes; however, in the course of time, few amendments have been effected empowering the Central Govt. to evolve a policy for the grant

SRI. FATHERAJ SINGHVI vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 200A, which provision is in para materia with Section 143(1). While processing the return of income under Section 143(1)(a) no personal hearing is provided to an assessee and as such the same is also not provided under Section 200A. Thus, the doctrine of principles of natural justice is given

MINTENT SERVICED APARTMENTS PVT LTD., vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 200A, which provision is in para materia with Section 143(1). While processing the return of income under Section 143(1)(a) no personal hearing is provided to an assessee and as such the same is also not provided under Section 200A. Thus, the doctrine of principles of natural justice is given

M/S PRAKASH BUS CORPORATION PVT LTD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 200A, which provision is in para materia with Section 143(1). While processing the return of income under Section 143(1)(a) no personal hearing is provided to an assessee and as such the same is also not provided under Section 200A. Thus, the doctrine of principles of natural justice is given

M/S MAHRISHI MELTCHEMS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 200A, which provision is in para materia with Section 143(1). While processing the return of income under Section 143(1)(a) no personal hearing is provided to an assessee and as such the same is also not provided under Section 200A. Thus, the doctrine of principles of natural justice is given