Search: section 68 | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

493 results for “section 68”+ Section 197clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi572 Karnataka493 Mumbai475 Bangalore300 Chennai118 Raipur107 Jaipur97 Hyderabad96 Ahmedabad87 Chandigarh76 Kolkata73 Pune61 Surat53 Indore38 Lucknow29 Ranchi29 Cochin23 Calcutta21 Visakhapatnam16 Cuttack14 Telangana12 Rajkot9 Jodhpur9 Nagpur8 Varanasi8 Patna7 Amritsar7 Allahabad7 SC5 Agra5 Rajasthan4 Guwahati2 ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1 Gauhati1 Dehradun1 Orissa1 Jabalpur1 Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Addition to Income42 Section 26018 Section 42

DR M BASAPPA REDDY vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/12915/2021HC Karnataka25 Oct 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice K.Natarajan Writ Petition No.12915 Of 2021 (Gm-Res)

Section 120Section 13(1)(d)Section 13(2)Section 4(1)Section 482

68, 74, 75, 76 which are as under: "67. Every offence committed by a police officer does not attract Section 197

SRI B V ACHARYA S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA ACHARYA vs. SRI N VENKATESHAIAH

WP/14047/2012HC Karnataka03 Aug 2012

Bench: V.JAGANNATHAN

Showing 1–20 of 493 · Page 1 of 25

...

Section 156(3)

Section 482

197 of Cr.P.C., 50 section 19 of the P.C.Act and section 7 of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, has summed up at para.55 the law thus: “Thus, in view of the above, the law on the issue of sanction can be summarised to the effect that the question of sanction is of paramount importance for protecting

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S WIPRO LTD

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/211/2009HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

68. What follows is, if the provisions contained in Section 90 is more beneficial to the assessee as compared to the - 85 - terms in the agreement by India with the Government of any country outside India then, notwithstanding such agreement, the provisions of the Act to the extent they are beneficial to that assesseee apply. The benefit claimed

M/S WIPRO LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/881/2008HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

68. What follows is, if the provisions contained in Section 90 is more beneficial to the assessee as compared to the - 85 - terms in the agreement by India with the Government of any country outside India then, notwithstanding such agreement, the provisions of the Act to the extent they are beneficial to that assesseee apply. The benefit claimed

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S FIBRES AND FABRICS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD.,

In the result, we do not find any merit in this

ITA/542/2016HC Karnataka17 Aug 2021

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 260Section 260A

197 (SC), 'A.L.A.FIRM VS. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX', (1991) 55 TAXMAN 497 (SC), 'ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS. RAJESH JHAVERI STOCK BROKERS (P.) LTD.', (2007) 161 TAXMAN 316 (SC), 'NEW DELHI TELEVISION LTD. 8 VS. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX', (2020) 116 TAXMANN.COM 151 (SC). 6. On the other hand, learned counsel for the assessee submitted that there

MINTENT SERVICED APARTMENTS PVT LTD., vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/25841/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view

M/S PRODIGY TECHNOVATIONS PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/11889/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view

M/S NEW MEDIA COMPANY vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/18788/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view

ECOLE SOLUTIONS PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/14669/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view

M/S TEACHERS CO OPERATIVE BANK vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/16939/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view

DR V. NARAYANASWAMY vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/10243/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view

M/S NEW MEDIA COMPANY vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/13065/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view

M/S. K K BROTHERS vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/3725/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view

M/S MAHRISHI MELTCHEMS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/53286/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view

SRI CHANDRAKAR K KAMATH vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF

WP/23541/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view

SREE C B EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL TRUST vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/38127/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view

M/S. LAKSHMINIRMAN BANGALORE PVT.LTD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

WP/26589/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view

M/S PRAKASH BUS CORPORATION PVT LTD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF

WP/37689/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view

SRI. FATHERAJ SINGHVI vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/41614/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view

M/S TEE ENN ENTERPRISES vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/19762/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view