M/S WIPRO LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

68. What follows is, if the provisions contained in Section 90 is more beneficial to the assessee as compared to the - 85 - terms in the agreement by India with the Government of any country outside India then, notwithstanding such agreement, the provisions of the Act to the extent they are beneficial to that assesseee apply. The benefit claimed

SRI. KRISHNA REDDY vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr Justice Suraj Govindaraj Writ Petition No. 11551 Of 2019 (La-Res) C/W Writ Petition No. 25329 Of 2017 (La-Res) Writ Petition No. 25759 Of 2017 (La-Res) Writ Petition No. 11550 Of 2019 (La-Res) Writ Petition No. 11553 Of 2019 (La-Res)

SECTION 24 AND 25 OF THE ACT, CENTRAL ACT 30 OF 2013 AND ETC. ***** IN W.P.NO.25759/2017 BETWEEN: VENKATASWAMAIAH @ K. VENKATASWAMAPPA S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/AT NO.68, 11TH MAIN BTM 1ST STAGE, DRC POST BENGALURU-560029 ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. V. LAKSHMINARAYANA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SMT. SHILPA RANI AND ANUSHA.L, ADVOCATES OF BALAJI ASSTS.) AND: 1. STATE

M SURESH KUMAR vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr Justice Suraj Govindaraj Writ Petition No. 11551 Of 2019 (La-Res) C/W Writ Petition No. 25329 Of 2017 (La-Res) Writ Petition No. 25759 Of 2017 (La-Res) Writ Petition No. 11550 Of 2019 (La-Res) Writ Petition No. 11553 Of 2019 (La-Res)

SECTION 24 AND 25 OF THE ACT, CENTRAL ACT 30 OF 2013 AND ETC. ***** IN W.P.NO.25759/2017 BETWEEN: VENKATASWAMAIAH @ K. VENKATASWAMAPPA S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/AT NO.68, 11TH MAIN BTM 1ST STAGE, DRC POST BENGALURU-560029 ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. V. LAKSHMINARAYANA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SMT. SHILPA RANI AND ANUSHA.L, ADVOCATES OF BALAJI ASSTS.) AND: 1. STATE

M/S APPLE INDIA PRIVATE LIMiTED vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice S.Sujatha

68,087/- should not be confiscated under Section 111[m] of the Customs Act, 1962. [ii] The differential duty of Rs.9,70,981/- should not be demanded and recovered from them under the provisions of Section 28[4] of the Customs Act, 1962. [iii] Interest under Section 28AA of the Customs Act, 1961 should not be levied

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S BELLAD and COMPANY

Appeal is allowed

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr Justice Hanchate Sanjeevkumar Regular First Appeal No.100154 Of 2015 (Par/Pos) Between:

11A - 00 Gs.) 30/1 10A - 04 Gs. 30/2 10A - 04 Gs AND: House, backyard, and Plot situated In Karlawad village. - Not Subject matter of suit in O.S.No.66/2003. e. Defendant No.1: Chouraddy Share:- * 4 Acres of land held jointly with bother - Not Subject matter - 45 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:6906 RFA No. 100154 of 2015 Hemaraddy-situated in Karlatti village