BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “section 68”+ Deemed Dividendclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,089Delhi678Chennai256Ahmedabad220Bangalore216Kolkata173Chandigarh99Hyderabad99Cochin95Jaipur85Pune79Raipur59Visakhapatnam39Indore35Amritsar32Lucknow31Surat30Cuttack23Calcutta20Nagpur14SC11Karnataka7Guwahati7Agra5Dehradun5Rajkot5Panaji4Telangana4Orissa2Rajasthan2Jodhpur2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Allahabad1Jabalpur1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 26013Section 14A4Section 2542Section 2(22)(e)2Section 260A2Section 143(1)2Disallowance2

M/S FIDELITY BUSINESS SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/512/2017HC Karnataka23 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 2(22)(e)Section 254Section 260

deemed to be dividend in terms of section 2(22)(e) of the Act, although the said provision would not be applicable? 5. We re-formulate the substantial question of law which we propose to answer and on which the arguments were heard by us, in the following manner:- “Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has power under Section

M/S T T K PRESTIGE LTD vs. THE UNION OF INDIA REPTD BY ITS FINANCE SECRETARY

WP/26037/2005HC Karnataka06 Dec 2019

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice P.B. Bajanthri W.P. No.26037/2005 C/W W.P.No.4464/2007 & W.P.No.27087/2005(It)

Section 115

dividends paid out of agricultural income would be taxable. It is in this context that the comments of the Court will have to be read (Para 26). Wherefore it is respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to allow the above writ petition in the interest of Justice and equity. 11. Question for consideration is Chapter

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S CHAMUNDI WINERY AND DISTILLERY

ITA/467/2015HC Karnataka25 Sept 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260

deem it to be the assignor’s income. But if the assessee merely applies the income so that it passes Date of Judgment 25-09-2018 I.T.A.No.155/2016 and connected matters The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. Vs. M/s. Chamundi Winery and Distillery 73/137 through him and goes on to an ultimate purpose, even though he may have entered

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (4) vs. M/S CHAMUNDI WINERY AND DISTILLERY

ITA/172/2017HC Karnataka25 Sept 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260

deem it to be the assignor’s income. But if the assessee merely applies the income so that it passes Date of Judgment 25-09-2018 I.T.A.No.155/2016 and connected matters The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. Vs. M/s. Chamundi Winery and Distillery 73/137 through him and goes on to an ultimate purpose, even though he may have entered

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S SUBRAMANYA CONSTRUCTIONS

In the result, we do not find any merit in these

ITA/398/2015HC Karnataka07 Apr 2021

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,M.G.S. KAMAL

Section 143(1)Section 14ASection 260Section 260A

DEEMED FIT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THESE I.T.As. COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT These appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short) have been preferred by the revenue against common order dated 20.02.2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter

PR,COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S SUBRAMANYA CONSTRUCTIONS

In the result, we do not find any merit in these

ITA/399/2015HC Karnataka07 Apr 2021

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,M.G.S. KAMAL

Section 143(1)Section 14ASection 260Section 260A

DEEMED FIT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THESE I.T.As. COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT These appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short) have been preferred by the revenue against common order dated 20.02.2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter

PASCHIM VIBHAG SHIKSHAN MANDAL BIJAGARI vs. THE COMMISSIONER and APPELLATE AUTHORITY

WP/101436/2018HC Karnataka01 Dec 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Suraj Govindaraj Writ Petition No.101436/2018 (S-Pro) C/W. Writ Petition No.77680/2013 (Gm-Ksr), Writ Petition No.81667/2013 (Gm-R/C) & Writ Petition No.101972/2017 (Gm-R/C)

dividend or distribution of any income or profits among their members. 15.15. Thus, it is clear that it is only for the above purposes that a Society could be registered. The requirements of the registration are mentioned under Section 6. The mode of forming of a society is mentioned under Section 5. 15.16. A perusal of Section 3 indicates that