BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 80P(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai34Chennai19Jaipur17Ahmedabad14Bangalore12Hyderabad11Delhi10Visakhapatnam8Kolkata7Pune7Cochin6Jodhpur6Surat5Karnataka4Amritsar4Nagpur2Chandigarh2Panaji2Rajkot2Indore1

Key Topics

Section 14811Section 14710Reopening of Assessment4Section 573Business Income3Reassessment3Disallowance3Limitation/Time-bar3Section 80P(2)(a)

THE SRI KANNIKAPARAMESWARI CO OP BANK LIMITED vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

The appeal stands allowed

ITA/65/2017HC Karnataka23 Nov 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 260Section 260ASection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)

4) Without prejudice, whether the Tribunal is justified in law in holding that an amount of Rs.44,53,500/- is to be assessed as income under the head Capital Gain and not under income from business and consequently denied the exemption under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act, 1961 and consequently passed a perverse order on the fact

2
Section 143(3)2

CORPORATION BANK vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Accordingly, the petitions are allowed

WP/27355/2015HC Karnataka11 Jan 2016

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Anand Byrareddy

Section 147Section 148Section 57

4 the years 2010-11 and 2009-10 respectively. Subsequently, the first respondent is said to have issued notices under Section 148 proposing to reassess the petitioners for the assessment years concerned on the ground that certain income was found to be escaped income. The reasons assigned were not indicated as the basis for reopening of the assessment

CORPORATION BANK vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Accordingly, the petitions are allowed

WP/30820/2015HC Karnataka11 Jan 2016

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Anand Byrareddy

Section 147Section 148Section 57

4 the years 2010-11 and 2009-10 respectively. Subsequently, the first respondent is said to have issued notices under Section 148 proposing to reassess the petitioners for the assessment years concerned on the ground that certain income was found to be escaped income. The reasons assigned were not indicated as the basis for reopening of the assessment

KARNATAKA BANK LTD vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX

Accordingly, the petition is allowed in

WP/40511/2015HC Karnataka11 Jan 2016

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Anand Byrareddy

Section 147Section 148Section 56Section 57Section 80P(2)(a)

reassessment proceedings having been initiated on a mere change of opinion, according to the learned Senior Advocate, was not permissible under Section 147 of the Act. All the details regarding investment portfolio of the petitioner for the year in question, including the annual report of the petitioner for the year ended 31.03.2010, necessary for one to have to come