BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 163clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi436Mumbai226Chennai153Jaipur71Chandigarh71Bangalore70Hyderabad62Raipur42Pune32Nagpur30Indore30Patna30Ahmedabad27Kolkata27Telangana23Allahabad22Lucknow21Cochin21Surat17Visakhapatnam11Rajkot10Agra7Amritsar7Guwahati5Jodhpur3Orissa2Karnataka2Varanasi2Uttarakhand1Panaji1Dehradun1Rajasthan1SC1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 1485Section 143(2)3Section 1473Section 148A2Section 143(3)2Section 1522Section 92C2

AZIM PREMJI TRUSTEE COMPANY PVT LTD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, I pass the following:-

WP/15910/2022HC Karnataka28 Oct 2022

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice S.R.Krishna Kumar

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 148ASection 56(2)

U/S 148A(d) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15 ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS W.P. COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, THIS DsAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:- ORDER In this petition, petitioner has sought for the following reliefs: “ (i) Quashing the impugned order dated: 28.07.2022 bearing ITBA/COM/F/17/2022- 23/1044214522(1) passed by Respondent No.1 under

NOVO NORDISK INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 12 (2

WP/21206/2014HC Karnataka
25 Jun 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 149Section 152Section 92B(2)Section 92C

u/s 143(3) of the Act inter alia accepting the conclusions of the TPO. It appears after lapse of close to six years from the end of relevant Assessment Year, by the impugned notice dated 28.3.2013 issued under Section 148 of the Act respondent No.1 initiated re-assessment proceedings for the subject Assessment Year on the ground that the income