BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 69clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,779Mumbai1,447Bangalore498Chennai420Jaipur335Ahmedabad332Hyderabad265Kolkata263Chandigarh170Pune118Raipur111Nagpur76Rajkot71Indore64Surat61Amritsar60Patna48Lucknow44Guwahati42Ranchi41Visakhapatnam40Dehradun34Agra26Cochin24Allahabad24Cuttack19Jodhpur19SC11Telangana11Calcutta6Orissa6Rajasthan5Karnataka4Varanasi3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Panaji2J&K1Jabalpur1Punjab & Haryana1Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 153C4Section 1444Section 143(3)3Section 14A3Section 260A2Section 1322Section 153D2Section 1482Reassessment2Disallowance

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SMT. G. LAKSHMI ARUNA

ITA/705/2018HC Karnataka31 Mar 2023

Bench: K.SOMASHEKAR,UMESH M ADIGA

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 144Section 153CSection 153DSection 260A

reassessment proceedings. Such an interpretation would be reading that judgment totally out of context in which the questions arose for decision in that case. It is neither desirable nor permissible to pick out a word or a sentence from the judgment of this Court, divorced from the context of the question under consideration and treat it to be the complete

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI. GALI JANARDHANA REDDY

ITA/704/2018
2
HC Karnataka
31 Mar 2023

Bench: K.SOMASHEKAR,UMESH M ADIGA

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 144Section 148Section 153CSection 153DSection 260A

69 “37. The Tribunal and the High Court are of the opinion that it could only be prepared by the assessing officer during the course of the assessment proceedings under Section 158BC of the Act and not after the completion of the said proceedings. The Courts below have relied upon the limitation period provided in Section 158BE

M/S KARNATAKA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is allowed and the impugned

ITA/11/2021HC Karnataka05 Feb 2021

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,V SRISHANANDA

Section 36(1)Section 39(1)Section 66(1)Section 70

REASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 31.05.2016 PASSED UNDER SECTION 39(1) OF THE KVAT ACT,2003 R/W SEC.36(1) AND 72(2) OF THE KVAT ACT 2003 BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (AUDIT) - 2.1, BANGALORE FOR THE TAX PERIODS FROM APRIL 2013 TO MARCH 2014. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER

HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

In the result, the appeal is disposed of

ITA/479/2016HC Karnataka08 Dec 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 148Section 14ASection 260Section 35(1)(iv)

reassessment order itself as being without jurisdiction, was justified in adjudicating on the merits and remanding the matter to the Assessing officer for computation of deduction under section 35(1)(iv) of the Act? 2. The Tribunal was right in holding that expenses to the extent of Rs.269,18,47,858/- incurred towards research and development is capital in nature