BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 40A(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai243Delhi217Chennai130Bangalore94Jaipur54Amritsar46Raipur35Kolkata34Hyderabad34Indore32Ahmedabad26Rajkot25Cuttack25Cochin23Pune18Agra16Lucknow11Surat11Guwahati10Nagpur10Jodhpur10Patna9Chandigarh8Visakhapatnam4Karnataka3Dehradun2SC1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 40A(3)3Section 1473Section 1483Reassessment3Addition to Income3Section 260A2Section 2602Reopening of Assessment2Disallowance2

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S MOOKAMBIKA DEVELOPERS

The appeals stand allowed to the extent as indicated above, and the matter is

ITA/374/2014HC Karnataka27 Jul 2015

Bench: VINEET SARAN,A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA

Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 260Section 40A(3)

Section 40A(3) of the Act was wrong and the disallowance to the extent of Rs.53,00,000/- as made by the Assessing Officer ought to have been maintained. By the impugned order dated 27.3.2014, the 4 Tribunal held that the reopening of the assessment was bad in law as, according to the Tribunal, unless the Assessing Officer has made

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S SAPTHAGIRI ENTERPRISES

The appeal is allowed and the

ITA/1139/2006HC Karnataka05 Mar 2013

Bench: B.MANOHAR,N.KUMAR

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 260ASection 40A(3)

40A(3). While completing the assessment for the year 1997-98, the Assessing Officer found that the assessee has received enhanced price for rectified spirit supplied by it to various arrack bottling units on behalf of the Government of Karnataka. The same was shown as outstanding liability in the balance sheet filed along with the return of income

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S MANDOVI MOTORS PVT., LTD.,

Appeal stands disposed of by answering the

ITA/417/2009HC Karnataka18 Aug 2015

Bench: B.MANOHAR,VINEET SARAN

Section 148Section 260ASection 40A(2)(b)

reassessments is bad in law as no addition was made in respect of the disallowance of depreciation on which assessments were reopened when the reopening assessments has taken place in respect of disallowance of rent paid to related at a higher rate contrary to Section 40A(2)(b) of the Act? 3