SRI AVINASH LALA CHANDANI vs. SRI P A NIRANJAN

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice A.V.Chandrashekara

d)(i) and (ii) of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999 is hereby allowed. The respondents are directed to quit, vacate and deliver vacant possession of the 10 schedule premises to the petitioners within 3 months from the date of this order. Petition under Section 27 (2)(j) and Section 31(1)(a) and (c) of the Karnataka Rent

SRI N GOVINDARAJU vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

Appeal stands disposed of

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET SARAN

d). Besides the aforesaid issue, on facts/merits also certain questions have been raised which would require consideration of this Court. Brief facts of this case are that the appellant, who is assessed as an individual, has income from house property, transport business, capital gains and other sources. For the assessment year 2004-05, he 3 filed his Income Tax return

HEWLETT PACKARD FINANCIAL SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: S.SUJATHA,JAYANT PATEL

27 has also been used in Section 5 of the CST Act. The Hon’ble Supreme Court has held in K.G.Khosla & Co. (P) Ltd., vs. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes” cited supra as under:- “Movement of goods from Belgium to India was in pursuance of the conditions of the contract between the assessee and the Director-General of Supplies. There

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SMT. G. LAKSHMI ARUNA

Bench: K.SOMASHEKAR,UMESH M ADIGA

D may be set-aside. 20. Apart from the contentions, the learned standing counsel has also filed written submission contending that the search under Section 132 was conducted on 25.10.2010 in the case of Shri. K. Raghavacharyulu. Pursuant to the search, proceedings under section 153C of the Act wee initiated in the case of the assessee for the Assessment Year

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI. GALI JANARDHANA REDDY

Bench: K.SOMASHEKAR,UMESH M ADIGA

D may be set- aside. 20.Apart from the contentions, the learned standing counsel has also filed written submission contending that the search under Section 132 was conducted on 25.10.2010 in the case of Shri. K. Raghavacharyulu. Pursuant to the search, proceedings under section 153C of the Act wee initiated in the case of the assessee for the Assessment Year

DEVAS MULTIMEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice P.B. Bajanthri Writ Petition No.11618 Of 2016 (T-It) Between:

reassessment or recomputation or fresh assessment, as the case may be, expires:) 22 (Provided that in the circumstances referred to in clause (ii) or clause (x) of Explanation 1 to section 153, if the period of limitation available to the Transfer Pricing Officer for making an order is less than sixty days, such remaining period shall be deemed to have

THE PR. COMMISIONER INCOME TAX vs. M/S. GMR INFRASTRUCTURE LTD

Appeals stand disposed of accordingly

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

D G M E N T Since common and akin issues are involved in these appeals, they are heard together and disposed of by this common judgment. - 14 - 2. These appeals are filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [‘Act’ for short] challenging the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘C’ Bench, Bengaluru

THE PR. COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. GMR INFRASTRUCTURE LTD

Appeals stand disposed of accordingly

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

D G M E N T Since common and akin issues are involved in these appeals, they are heard together and disposed of by this common judgment. - 14 - 2. These appeals are filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [‘Act’ for short] challenging the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘C’ Bench, Bengaluru

PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S GMR HYDERABAD

Appeals stand disposed of accordingly

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

D G M E N T Since common and akin issues are involved in these appeals, they are heard together and disposed of by this common judgment. - 14 - 2. These appeals are filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [‘Act’ for short] challenging the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘C’ Bench, Bengaluru

PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S GMR HYDERABAD

Appeals stand disposed of accordingly

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

D G M E N T Since common and akin issues are involved in these appeals, they are heard together and disposed of by this common judgment. - 14 - 2. These appeals are filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [‘Act’ for short] challenging the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘C’ Bench, Bengaluru

THE PR. COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. GMR INFRASTRUCTURE LTD

Appeals stand disposed of accordingly

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

D G M E N T Since common and akin issues are involved in these appeals, they are heard together and disposed of by this common judgment. - 14 - 2. These appeals are filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [‘Act’ for short] challenging the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘C’ Bench, Bengaluru

PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S GMR HYDERABAD

Appeals stand disposed of accordingly

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

D G M E N T Since common and akin issues are involved in these appeals, they are heard together and disposed of by this common judgment. - 14 - 2. These appeals are filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [‘Act’ for short] challenging the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘C’ Bench, Bengaluru

PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S GMR HYDERABAD

Appeals stand disposed of accordingly

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

D G M E N T Since common and akin issues are involved in these appeals, they are heard together and disposed of by this common judgment. - 14 - 2. These appeals are filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [‘Act’ for short] challenging the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘C’ Bench, Bengaluru

PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S GMR HYDERABAD

Appeals stand disposed of accordingly

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

D G M E N T Since common and akin issues are involved in these appeals, they are heard together and disposed of by this common judgment. - 14 - 2. These appeals are filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [‘Act’ for short] challenging the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘C’ Bench, Bengaluru

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) vs. M/S. DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PVT. LTD.,

Appeals stand disposed of accordingly

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

D G M E N T Since common and akin issues are involved in these appeals, they are heard together and disposed of by this common judgment. - 14 - 2. These appeals are filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [‘Act’ for short] challenging the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘C’ Bench, Bengaluru

PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S GMR HYDERABAD

Appeals stand disposed of accordingly

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

D G M E N T Since common and akin issues are involved in these appeals, they are heard together and disposed of by this common judgment. - 14 - 2. These appeals are filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [‘Act’ for short] challenging the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘C’ Bench, Bengaluru

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. IBC KNOWLEDGE PARK PVT. LTD.,

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,JAYANT PATEL

d), by execution of a fresh lease which shall be duly registered, and the rent payable for the renewed term shall also be as provided in Annexure III. The detailed - 20 - calculations of rent payable by the LESSEE for the entire duration of the lease and its renewal, is set out in Annexure III. The LESSEE shall pay an amount

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. IBC KNOWLEDGE PARK PVT. LTD.,

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,JAYANT PATEL

d), by execution of a fresh lease which shall be duly registered, and the rent payable for the renewed term shall also be as provided in Annexure III. The detailed - 20 - calculations of rent payable by the LESSEE for the entire duration of the lease and its renewal, is set out in Annexure III. The LESSEE shall pay an amount