BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 255(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi313Mumbai280Jaipur81Chennai64Chandigarh59Bangalore57Kolkata35Ahmedabad35Telangana27Pune25Hyderabad25Raipur21Allahabad20Guwahati17Cochin15Surat13Cuttack12Amritsar10Jodhpur10Patna10Indore9Visakhapatnam8Lucknow5Karnataka4Orissa4Rajkot3Ranchi3Jabalpur2Kerala2Nagpur2SC2Agra1J&K1Rajasthan1Dehradun1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 1486Section 115J6Section 1475Section 2603Addition to Income3Section 260A2Section 1322Section 143(2)2Section 10B2Deduction

M/S ING VYSYA BANK LIMITED vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result appeal fails and it is hereby

WA/2458/2010HC Karnataka06 Jul 2012

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,AJIT J GUNJAL

Section 245CSection 245D(1)Section 4

reassessment for any of the assessment years referred to in section (b) of sub-section (1) of section 153A or clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 153B in case of a person referred to in section 153A or section 153C have been initiated, the additional amount of income-tax payable on the income disclosed in the application exceeds

THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S VSL MINING COMPANY PVT LTD

Appeal is dismissed as being

ITA/32/2020HC Karnataka
2
Survey u/s 133A2
20 Sept 2024

Bench: S.G.PANDIT,C.M. POONACHA

Section 10BSection 132Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 260Section 260A

4. Vide order dated 31.12.2009, the AO also dealt with the issues pertaining to the alleged unaccounted transactions of the assessee with the said MKJ. It referred to various documents that were recovered in the search conducted as well as the statements of MKJ. After considering the same, the AO recorded a finding that MKJ carried out transactions on behalf

SRI C M MAHADEVA S/O SRI MANCHE GOWDA vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeal stands allowed

ITA/795/2009HC Karnataka24 Aug 2015

Bench: B.MANOHAR,VINEET SARAN

Section 139Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 255(6)Section 260Section 69

255(6), as the reasons recorded go to the root of jurisdiction?”. 4. We have heard Sri G.Venkatesh along with Sri K.S.Hanumantha Rao, Advocate, learned counsel for the appellant; as well as Sri E.I.Sanmathi, learned counsel for the respondent, and perused the record. 5. Questions No.1 and 2 relate to the reopening of the assessment under Section

M/S YOKOGAWA INDIA LTD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

In the result, the appeal is disposed of

ITA/87/2012HC Karnataka04 Jun 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 260Section 260A

4. The assessee thereafter filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal vide order dated 12.09.2011 held that as per Section 115JB of the Act, book profit is defined as net profit as shown in profit and loss account for relevant previous year prepared under sub-Section (2) in accordance with the provisions