BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 245clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi425Mumbai287Chennai106Bangalore83Kolkata55Jaipur48Ahmedabad38Chandigarh36Hyderabad35Indore35Surat24Lucknow20Raipur20Pune19Guwahati18Allahabad17Rajkot16SC11Jodhpur10Nagpur10Amritsar9Cochin8Patna7Dehradun5Karnataka3Cuttack3Panaji2Visakhapatnam2K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Jabalpur1Agra1Rajasthan1Ranchi1Telangana1Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)4Section 2012Section 2062Section 2602Section 42Section 245C2Deduction2Limitation/Time-bar2

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS vs. M/S BHARAT HOTELS LIMITED

Appeal stands dismissed

ITA/393/2009HC Karnataka02 Dec 2015

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET SARAN

Section 143(3)Section 153Section 154Section 194Section 201Section 201(1)Section 206

reassessment under Sections 147 and 148 of the Act would be on a completely different footing, and therefore, would not merit consideration. However, keeping in view the fact that the Tribunal, in various decisions, had taken the view that four years period would be a reasonable period of time to initiate action, the Delhi High Court held that where

M/S ING VYSYA BANK LIMITED vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result appeal fails and it is hereby

WA/2458/2010HC Karnataka06 Jul 2012

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,AJIT J GUNJAL

Section 245CSection 245D(1)Section 4

245(C) of the I.T. Act after detection and discovery of the concealed income? 4. Whether the impugned order passed by the Settlement Commission is in accordance with law? 6. The learned Single Judge of this court allowed the writ petition in part by order dated 20.05.2010 in so far as it relates to granting immunity from penalty and prosecution

THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

ITA/166/2011HC Karnataka24 Aug 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Section 201(1)Section 201(3)Section 231Section 260Section 260A

245 TAXMAN 80 (DELHI), ‘CIT VS. CJ INTERNATIONAL HOTELS (P) LTD’, 372 ITR 684 (DELHI), decision of Andhra Pradesh High Court in ‘CIT V. UB ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENTS LTD’, 371 ITR 314 (ANDHRA PRADESH), decision of Bombay High Court in ‘DIT VS. MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA’, 365 ITR 560 (BOMBAY) and decision of High Court of Himachal Pradesh in ‘CIT V SATLUJ