PR.COMMISSIONER vs. M/S ESTEEM CLASSIC

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,M.G.S. KAMAL

reassessment dated 15.3.2016 for the Assessment Year 2010-11 issued by the 2nd appellant - The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1, Aayakar Bhavan, Sedam Road, Kalaburagi under Sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act' for the sake of brevity). 2. The brief facts of the case are, the original Assessing Authority, while

MRS RATNABAI W/O LATE PRABHU SAGAR vs. MR NAVEEN S/O NAGANNA AND ORS

Appeal is allowed in part in the aforesaid terms

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,B.A.PATIL

Section 168 of the Act uses the word ‘just compensation’ which, in our opinion, should be assigned a broad meaning. We cannot, in determining the issue involved in the matter, lose sight of the fact that the private sector companies in place of introducing a pension scheme takes recourse to payment of contributory Provident Fund, Gratuity and other perks

THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER vs. SATHISHKUMAR

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

206 B.H.ROAD, SHIVAMOGGA POLICY NO.670601/31/08/02/00006097 BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LIMITED REGIONAL OFFICE “MAHALAKSHMI CHAMBERS” 2ND FLOOR, 9/2, M.G.ROAD BANGALORE-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPUTY MANAGER ... APPELLANT (BY SRI. P.B.RAJU, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SATHISHKUMAR S/O BOJA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 1 YEAR S/O LATE GOPAL, MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS GUARDIAN GRANDFATHER R. GOVINDAPPA 2 AGED ABOUT