BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “reassessment”+ Section 201(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi589Mumbai354Bangalore292Chennai204Jaipur117Ahmedabad94Kolkata55Chandigarh44Visakhapatnam36Pune35Cuttack31Rajkot29Hyderabad28Raipur28Cochin24Amritsar19Jodhpur17Surat12Patna12Indore12Lucknow11Dehradun8Karnataka7Guwahati5Nagpur5Panaji4Allahabad3SC3Telangana3Agra2Uttarakhand1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 2606Section 10A5Section 201(1)4Section 80I4Deduction4Section 1483Section 1473Section 143(3)3Reassessment3Section 201

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS vs. M/S BHARAT HOTELS LIMITED

Appeal stands dismissed

ITA/393/2009HC Karnataka02 Dec 2015

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET SARAN

Section 143(3)Section 153Section 154Section 194Section 201Section 201(1)Section 206

reassessement or recomputation in which the notice under Section 148 was served, the same would amount to seven years from the end of the financial year and he thus contends that reasonable period of limitation under Section 201 of the Act should also be seven years from the end of the relevant financial year. Learned counsel has also relied

2
Addition to Income2
Limitation/Time-bar2

THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

ITA/166/2011HC Karnataka24 Aug 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Section 201(1)Section 201(3)Section 231Section 260Section 260A

3. I.T.A.No.148/2011 was admitted by a bench of this court vide order dated 29.08.2011 on the following substantial question of law: (i) What is the reasonable time within which the proceedings have to be initiated under Section 201(1) of the Income Tax Act, as during the relevant period, the statute did not prescribe any period of limitation

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIT(A) vs. M/S HEWLETT PACKARD GLOBALSOFT PVT LTD

Appeals are hereby dismissed by

ITA/65/2014HC Karnataka14 Aug 2015

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,VINEET SARAN

Section 10Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 148Section 260

reassessed. To confer jurisdiction under Section 147(a) two conditions were required to be satisfied firstly the Assessing Officer must have reason to believe that income profits or gains 22 chargeable to income- tax have escaped assessment, and secondly he must also have reason to believe that such escapement has occurred by reason of either (i) omission or failure

THE PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S MAJESTIC DEVELOPERS

ITA/287/2018HC Karnataka05 Feb 2021

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,V SRISHANANDA

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 14ASection 260Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

201 (Kar.) HC]?" 3 2. Facts leading to filing of this appeal briefly stated are that the assessee - company claims to be involved in the business of development and construction and had claimed deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Act in its return of income. The assessment order under Section 143(3) came to be passed. Subsequently, re-assessment

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI SADGURU EDUCATION TRUST

Appeals stand disposed of

ITA/433/2014HC Karnataka22 Sept 2015

Bench: B.MANOHAR,VINEET SARAN

Section 147Section 148

201 Respondent (By Sri K K Chythanya, Adv.) Appeals are filed under S.260 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 praying to set aside the order dated 9.5.2014 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, C Bench, Bangalore in ITA 715/2013 & 716/2013 for assessment year 2005-06 & 2006-07. 2 Appeals coming on for hearing this day, Vineet Saran J, delivered

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI SADGURU EDUCATION TRUST

Appeals stand disposed of

ITA/434/2014HC Karnataka22 Sept 2015

Bench: B.MANOHAR,VINEET SARAN

Section 147Section 148

201 Respondent (By Sri K K Chythanya, Adv.) Appeals are filed under S.260 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 praying to set aside the order dated 9.5.2014 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, C Bench, Bangalore in ITA 715/2013 & 716/2013 for assessment year 2005-06 & 2006-07. 2 Appeals coming on for hearing this day, Vineet Saran J, delivered

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S H.H. CEMENT PRODUCTS

WA/5798/2011HC Karnataka23 Mar 2016

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,JAYANT PATEL

Section 39(1)Section 4Section 59

3. The brief facts of the cases are that on 01/04/2005 the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as “The KVAT Act”) has come into force and as per the said Act, there was specific Entry No.2 of Schedule III which provided as under:- “All kinds of bricks including fly ash brick; refractory bricks and the like; ashphaltic