THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIT(A) vs. M/S HEWLETT PACKARD GLOBALSOFT PVT LTD

Appeals are hereby dismissed by

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,VINEET SARAN

reassessed. To confer jurisdiction under Section 147(a) two conditions were required to be satisfied firstly the Assessing Officer must have reason to believe that income profits or gains 22 chargeable to income- tax have escaped assessment, and secondly he must also have reason to believe that such escapement has occurred by reason of either (i) omission or failure

THE PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S MAJESTIC DEVELOPERS

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,V SRISHANANDA

201 (Kar.) HC]?" 3 2. Facts leading to filing of this appeal briefly stated are that the assessee - company claims to be involved in the business of development and construction and had claimed deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Act in its return of income. The assessment order under Section 143(3) came to be passed. Subsequently, re-assessment

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI SADGURU EDUCATION TRUST

Appeals stand disposed of

Bench: B.MANOHAR,VINEET SARAN

201 Respondent (By Sri K K Chythanya, Adv.) Appeals are filed under S.260 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 praying to set aside the order dated 9.5.2014 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, C Bench, Bangalore in ITA 715/2013 & 716/2013 for assessment year 2005-06 & 2006-07. 2 Appeals coming on for hearing this day, Vineet Saran J, delivered

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI SADGURU EDUCATION TRUST

Appeals stand disposed of

Bench: B.MANOHAR,VINEET SARAN

201 Respondent (By Sri K K Chythanya, Adv.) Appeals are filed under S.260 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 praying to set aside the order dated 9.5.2014 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, C Bench, Bangalore in ITA 715/2013 & 716/2013 for assessment year 2005-06 & 2006-07. 2 Appeals coming on for hearing this day, Vineet Saran J, delivered

ASLAM SHARIFF vs. ASLAM

The appeal is partly allowed

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice N.K. Sudhindrarao Mfa No.1812/2016 (Mv)

201. …RESPONDENTS (By Sri S.V HEGDE MULKHAND, ADVOCATE) 2 THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 5.12.2015 PASSED IN MVC No.654/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MEMBER, ADDITIONAL MACT, HASSAN, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS MFA HAVING BEEN

SMT.SUNITHA vs. SRI LAXMAN B KUNDAR

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,ASHOK G.NIJAGANNAVAR

201 UDUPI DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B. PRADEEP, ADVOCATE FOR R-2; SRI O. MAHESH, ADVOCATE FOR R-4; V/O. DATED 06/09/2019 R-1 & R-3 ARE DELETED) ***** THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 19.01.2016 PASSED IN MVC NO.319/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MEMBER, ADDITIONAL

SMT MONTHI N PAI vs. SRI SANJEEVA SHETTY

The appeals are allowed in part

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice H.P. Sandesh

201 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI RAVISH BENNI, ADVOCATE FOR R3; R1 AND R2 ARE SERVED) THIS M.F.A IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 23.07.2012 PASSED IN MVC.NO.125/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, JMFC, MACT, SAGAR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION

KUMARI S MANASA BHAKTHA vs. THE MANAGING PARTNER

In the result, we pass the following:

Bench: B.VEERAPPA,K.S. HEMALEKHA

201. …RESPONDENTS 6 (BY SMT. MANJULA N TEJASWI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 VIDE ORDER DATED 27.05.2025. NOTICE TO R1 IS DISPENSED WITH) **** THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 29.11.2017 PASSED IN MVC NO.736/16 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MACT. KARKALA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S H.H. CEMENT PRODUCTS

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,JAYANT PATEL

Section 39(1), there was no need for the first appellant to interfere with the jurisdiction of the Deputy Commissioner. 5. However, on 26/03/2010, the first appellant issued show cause notices proposing to levy VAT at 12.5% on paving bricks/blocks treating them as falling outside entry No.2 of Schedule III. On 05/04/2010, the first appellant proceeded to pass an order