BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “reassessment”+ Section 133(6)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,342Delhi1,066Kolkata329Jaipur229Bangalore229Ahmedabad131Chennai120Chandigarh71Raipur62Hyderabad60Pune55Lucknow45Surat42Patna41Indore41Guwahati37Ranchi30Agra28Telangana27Nagpur23Visakhapatnam21Rajkot20Allahabad20Cuttack14Amritsar13Cochin10Dehradun9Karnataka7SC6Jodhpur4Rajasthan3Orissa3Calcutta3Kerala2Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 26022Section 2633Section 260A2Section 148A2Section 143(3)2Section 144C2Section 24(1)2Section 42Addition to Income2

M/S MYSORE POLYMERS & RUBBER PRODUCTS LTD vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES

In the result, writ appeal No

STRP/112/2008HC Karnataka17 Jun 2013

Bench: D.V.SHYLENDRA KUMAR,B.S.INDRAKALA

Section 23(1)Section 24(1)Section 4Section 6

reassessment orders dated 29.7.2004 and particularly the assessment order dated 5.8.2004 in respect of years 2002-03 and 2003-04 respectively are not sustainable and liable to be quashed as the petitioner was not liable to pay initial tax under Section 6-B of the Act and allowed the writ petition. It is against this order of the learned Single

AZIM PREMJI TRUSTEE COMPANY PVT LTD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, I pass the following:-

WP/15910/2022
HC Karnataka
28 Oct 2022

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice S.R.Krishna Kumar

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 148ASection 56(2)

133(6) of the I.T.Act, to which a reply was submitted on 24.06.2021, pursuant to which, one more notice dated 25.06.2021 was issued by the 1st respondent, to which also, the petitioner submitted replies dated 28.06.2021 and 29.06.2021. Thereafter, respondents issued a Notice dated 30.06.2021 under Section 148 of the I.T.Act (after amendment). The petitioner challenged the said notice

DEVAS MULTIMEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

WP/11618/2016HC Karnataka27 Sept 2019

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice P.B. Bajanthri Writ Petition No.11618 Of 2016 (T-It) Between:

Section 142(4)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 144CSection 263Section 92C

reassessment or recomputation or fresh assessment, as the case may be, expires:) 22 (Provided that in the circumstances referred to in clause (ii) or clause (x) of Explanation 1 to section 153, if the period of limitation available to the Transfer Pricing Officer for making an order is less than sixty days, such remaining period shall be deemed to have

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX GULBARGA vs. M/S MANJUNATHA COTTON AND GINNING FACTORY

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/2564/2005HC Karnataka13 Dec 2012

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,N.KUMAR

Section 260Section 260A

133(6) of the Act. The statutory returns, which were filed by the assessee, when compared with the stock position reflected in Form 3(c)(b) disclosed a difference of 3,01,240 metric tons. On 27.02.2006, a 14 notice under Section 148 of the Act was issued for re- opening of the assessment. On 05.05.2006 the assessment was completed

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. IBC KNOWLEDGE PARK PVT. LTD.,

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue

ITA/402/2009HC Karnataka28 Apr 2016

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,JAYANT PATEL

Section 260

6,43,715/- per month if the bridge - 23 - area is not authorized for commercial use. The LESSORS shall not be entitled to any escalation during the three years of the first term, for any reason whatsoever. The said amounts to be paid alongwith lease rents. ii. For the second term of the lease, if the charges exceed

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. IBC KNOWLEDGE PARK PVT. LTD.,

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue

ITA/403/2009HC Karnataka28 Apr 2016

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,JAYANT PATEL

Section 260

6,43,715/- per month if the bridge - 23 - area is not authorized for commercial use. The LESSORS shall not be entitled to any escalation during the three years of the first term, for any reason whatsoever. The said amounts to be paid alongwith lease rents. ii. For the second term of the lease, if the charges exceed

THE COMMISIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S IBC KNOWLEDGE PARK PVT LTD

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue

ITA/402/2014HC Karnataka28 Apr 2016

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,JAYANT PATEL

Section 260

6,43,715/- per month if the bridge - 23 - area is not authorized for commercial use. The LESSORS shall not be entitled to any escalation during the three years of the first term, for any reason whatsoever. The said amounts to be paid alongwith lease rents. ii. For the second term of the lease, if the charges exceed