BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “reassessment”+ Section 119(2)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi555Mumbai467Chennai151Bangalore137Jaipur116Kolkata111Chandigarh99Hyderabad84Ahmedabad70Raipur63Indore61Pune57Nagpur38Guwahati36Telangana30Patna28Ranchi24Allahabad23Cuttack21Surat20Lucknow20Rajkot19Cochin18Amritsar10Karnataka8SC8Agra6Visakhapatnam6Orissa5Jodhpur4Dehradun4Jabalpur3Calcutta3Rajasthan2

Key Topics

Section 143(3)10Section 1488Section 2607Section 153A7Section 1445Section 153D5Section 260A4Section 153C4Addition to Income3Disallowance

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI. GALI JANARDHANA REDDY

ITA/704/2018HC Karnataka31 Mar 2023

Bench: K.SOMASHEKAR,UMESH M ADIGA

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 144Section 148Section 153CSection 153DSection 260A

B shall apply. 39. The opening words of Section 158BD of the Act are that the assessing officer must be satisfied that “undisclosed income” belongs to any other person other than the person with respect to whom a search was made under Section 132 of the Act or a requisition of books were made under Section 132A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SMT. G. LAKSHMI ARUNA

2
ITA/705/2018HC Karnataka31 Mar 2023

Bench: K.SOMASHEKAR,UMESH M ADIGA

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 144Section 153CSection 153DSection 260A

B shall apply. 39. The opening words of Section 158BD of the Act are that the assessing officer must be satisfied that “undisclosed income” belongs to any other person other than the person with respect to whom a search was made under Section 132 of the Act or a requisition of books were made under Section 132A

M/S. THE KOLAR & CHICKBALLAPUR vs. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER

The appeal stands disposed of as indicated above

ITA/280/2015HC Karnataka01 Sept 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

Section 119(2)(b)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 260Section 260A

reassessment under Section 147, not a case for rectification wherein the tax liability has been enhanced. 6. Learned counsel for the revenue justifying the orders of the authorities submitted that Section 80 of the Act provides for submission of return for losses. In terms of the said Section, it is mandatory that the return for losses has to be filed

DEVAS MULTIMEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

WP/11618/2016HC Karnataka27 Sept 2019

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice P.B. Bajanthri Writ Petition No.11618 Of 2016 (T-It) Between:

Section 142(4)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 144CSection 263Section 92C

reassessment or recomputation or fresh assessment, as the case may be, expires:) 22 (Provided that in the circumstances referred to in clause (ii) or clause (x) of Explanation 1 to section 153, if the period of limitation available to the Transfer Pricing Officer for making an order is less than sixty days, such remaining period shall be deemed to have

M/S THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE APEX BANK vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, the appeal is disposed of

ITA/392/2016HC Karnataka06 Jul 2021

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 260Section 260A

119 of the Act. It is further submitted that Section 148 of the Act provides a remedy to the revenue and is not a remedy to the assessee. It is also submitted that proceeding under Section 148 can be initiated only in respect of such income which escapes assessment and the same has been interpreted by the Supreme Court

GOPAL S. PANDIT vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF

ITA/38/2017HC Karnataka28 Jun 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 260

2. The learned Counsel for the Assessee has suggested the following four substantial questions of law in the Memorandum of Appeal filed by the Appellant. Date of Judgment 28-06-2018, ITA No.38/2017 Gopal S. Pandit Vs The Commissioner of Income Tax & another . 3/14 I. “Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, Appellate Tribunal was correct

GOPAL S. PANDIT vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/34/2017HC Karnataka25 Jun 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 260Section 54B

b) of sub-section (1) of section 153B, except with the prior approval of the Joint Commissioner. Date of Judgment 25-06-2018, ITA No.34/2017 Gopal S. Pandit Vs The Commissioner of Income Tax & another . 7/16 Provided that nothing contained in this section shall apply where the assessment or reassessment order, as the case may be, is required

M/S GOKULDAS EXPORTS vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Appeal is allowed

ITA/635/2016HC Karnataka19 Jul 2022

Bench: P.S.DINESH KUMAR,C.M. POONACHA

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151(1)Section 260Section 3Section 45(4)

B IN ITA NO. 1062/BANG/2004 DATED: 08/06/2016 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 1995-96. (ANNEXURE A). III. TO PASS SUCH OTHER ORDERS, AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT AND PROPER TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE. THIS ITA COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY P.S. DINESH KUMAR J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT This appeal by the assessee has been admitted