BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Cash Depositclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,670Mumbai1,285Chennai548Jaipur445Ahmedabad439Kolkata370Bangalore354Pune249Hyderabad242Indore170Chandigarh167Amritsar161Surat141Rajkot127Visakhapatnam122Raipur91Nagpur90Cochin89Agra75Patna61Cuttack48Guwahati46Lucknow44Jodhpur31Allahabad25Jabalpur9Varanasi9Ranchi8Dehradun7Telangana7Panaji5SC4Calcutta4Karnataka3Orissa3Rajasthan2Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 1475Section 2604Section 143(3)3Section 1483Section 260A2Exemption2

THE SRI KANNIKAPARAMESWARI CO OP BANK LIMITED vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

The appeal stands allowed

ITA/65/2017HC Karnataka23 Nov 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 260Section 260ASection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)

deposited funds at somewhat higher rate of interest. But the banker has always to keep enough cash or easily realizable securities to meet any probable demand by the depositors. No doubt there will generally be loans to persons of undoubted solvency which can quickly be called in, but it may be very undesirable to use this second line of defence

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI H E PANDURANGA

The appeal is disposed of

ITA/211/2013HC Karnataka08 Sept 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 147Section 158BSection 2Section 260Section 260A

reassessment made protectively under Section 147 for the assessment years 1996-97 and 1997-98 by holding them as infructuous without going into the merits of the case when the issues with reference to unexplained cash credits of Rs.50 Lakhs and Rs.65,10,000/- have been found to be unexplained? (ii) Whether the Tribunal was correct in 3 applying

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. ING VYSYA BANK LTD

In the result, this appeal is allowed in part,

ITA/2886/2005HC Karnataka06 Jun 2012

Bench: B.MANOHAR,D.V.SHYLENDRA KUMAR

Section 143Section 260Section 36(1)(vii)Section 37(2)Section 80M

reassessment and if the finding of the Tribunal on this aspect is set aside, then the matter will have to be remanded to the Tribunal for recording a finding etc. 22. We have bestowed our attention to the submissions made at the Bar and have also examined the legal position in the wake of the statutory provisions of the Board